Re: "free" borland C++ compiler

["Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU>]

>[1.3.13-dev] question:
>
>  Any objections from the list before alloc.h becomes ap_alloc.h?

I guess that is okay -- it is only included in a couple places because
the main one is httpd.h, so changing the name shouldn't impact the
third-party modules much.  Still a risky step, though, and you'll have
to bump the minor MMN so that people can use a feature test if needed.

....Roy

RE: "free" borland C++ compiler

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@lnd.com>]

Would do... I'm waiting for another +1 or two.

But I'm a little confused, since no structures are modified...
is that simply an autoconf trigger to regenerate dependencies
or something like that?

TIA,

Bill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 8:03 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Re: "free" borland C++ compiler 
> 
> 
> >[1.3.13-dev] question:
> >
> >  Any objections from the list before alloc.h becomes ap_alloc.h?
> 
> I guess that is okay -- it is only included in a couple places because
> the main one is httpd.h, so changing the name shouldn't impact the
> third-party modules much.  Still a risky step, though, and you'll have
> to bump the minor MMN so that people can use a feature test if needed.
> 
> ....Roy
>