You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by zjureel <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2017/08/30 10:02:23 UTC

[GitHub] flink pull request #4621: [FLINK-7495] Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#ini...

GitHub user zjureel opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4621

    [FLINK-7495] Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#initializeState() in the beginning

    ## What is the purpose of the change
    
    Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#initializeState() in the beginning
    
    ## Brief change log
    
      - *Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#initializeState() in the beginning*
    
    
    ## Verifying this change
    
    No need test case
    
    ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
    
      - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
      - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with `@Public(Evolving)`: (no)
      - The serializers: (no)
      - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
      - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (don't know)
    
    ## Documentation
    
      - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
      - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
    


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/zjureel/flink FLINK-7495

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4621.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #4621
    
----
commit 1f2b7d582ef7b6fe65937c6421ec3ee1240fd2a1
Author: zjureel <zj...@gmail.com>
Date:   2017-08-30T02:51:14Z

    [FLINK-7495] Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#initializeState() in the beginning

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] flink issue #4621: [FLINK-7495] Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#initialize...

Posted by aljoscha <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4621
  
    @PedroMrChaves Thanks, I also merged on the `release-1.3` branch so it will be released if/when a Flink 1.3.3 gets released.


---

[GitHub] flink issue #4621: [FLINK-7495] Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#initialize...

Posted by tedyu <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user tedyu commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4621
  
    lgtm


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] flink issue #4621: [FLINK-7495] Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#initialize...

Posted by aljoscha <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4621
  
    👍 This looks good, I merged!
    
    Could you please close the PR?


---

[GitHub] flink pull request #4621: [FLINK-7495] Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#ini...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4621


---

[GitHub] flink issue #4621: [FLINK-7495] Call to AbstractUdfStreamOperator#initialize...

Posted by PedroMrChaves <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user PedroMrChaves commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4621
  
    This change needs to also be added to previous versions. I'm using version 1.3.2 and realised that the initializeState(..) function was not being called. 


---