You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@arrow.apache.org by "Weston Pace (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/10/20 23:04:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-17783) [C++] Aggregate kernel should not mandate alignment
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17621402#comment-17621402 ]
Weston Pace commented on ARROW-17783:
-------------------------------------
My concern is less performance and more complexity and testing. I've made a proposal at ARROW-18115 which would address this (albeit this particular case would take a performance hit)
> [C++] Aggregate kernel should not mandate alignment
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-17783
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17783
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0, 8.0.0
> Reporter: Yifei Yang
> Assignee: Weston Pace
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: flight-alignment-test.zip
>
>
> When using arrow's aggregate kernel with table transferred from arrow flight (DoGet), it may crash at arrow::util::CheckAlignment(). However using original data it works well, also if I first serialize the transferred table into bytes then recreate an arrow table using the bytes, it works well.
> "flight-alignment-test" attached is the minimal test that can produce the issue, which basically does "sum(total_revenue) group by l_suppkey" using the table from "DoGet()". ("DummyNode" is just used to be the producer of the aggregate node as the producer is required to create the aggregate node)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)