(tooling-agents) branch main updated: ASVS audit: 17.3.2.md (redacted)

[as...@apache.org]

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

asf-tooling pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tooling-agents.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
     new d001959  ASVS audit: 17.3.2.md (redacted)
d001959 is described below

commit d001959d1facb01107264afa2de5dc56ecde9f2c
Author: ASF Tooling Team <ro...@apache.org>
AuthorDate: Tue May 5 14:05:48 2026 +0200

    ASVS audit: 17.3.2.md (redacted)
---
 ASVS/reports/steve/v3/d0aa7e9/all/17.3.2.md | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+)

diff --git a/ASVS/reports/steve/v3/d0aa7e9/all/17.3.2.md b/ASVS/reports/steve/v3/d0aa7e9/all/17.3.2.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7b4ff40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ASVS/reports/steve/v3/d0aa7e9/all/17.3.2.md
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+# Security Audit Report: ASVS 17.3.2
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **Repository** | apache/steve/v3 |
+| **Audit Date** | May 05, 2026 |
+| **Auditor** | Tooling Agents (bundled-pass mode) |
+| **ASVS Requirement** | ASVS 17.3.2 |
+| **Files Analyzed** | 4 relevant / 49 total |
+| **Files Skipped** | 12 |
+
+**Requirement description:** Verify that the signaling server is able to continue processing legitimate signaling messages when encountering malformed signaling message that could cause a denial of service condition. This could include implementing input validation, safely handling integer overflows, preventing buffer…
+
+### Findings Overview
+
+| Severity | Count |
+|----------|-------|
+| 🔴 Critical | 0 |
+| 🟠 High | 0 |
+| 🟡 Medium | 0 |
+| 🟢 Low | 0 |
+
+---
+
+## ASVS-17.3.2: Signaling Server Malformed Message Resilience
+
+### Findings for 17.3.2
+No findings detected.
+
+The audited code is not a WebRTC signaling server and does not process WebRTC signaling messages. It is an election management web application that processes HTTP form submissions and JSON payloads for election operations.
+
+The application does not handle:
+- SDP parsing (offer/answer)
+- ICE candidate message parsing
+- WebRTC-specific signaling protocol messages
+- Any signaling protocol that could cause denial of service through malformed messages in a WebRTC context
+
+**Note on general input validation**: While not applicable to this WebRTC-specific requirement, the application does perform some input validation:
+- Date validation via `datetime.datetime.fromisoformat()` in `_set_election_date()`
+- Election/issue existence checks via database queries
+- Vote type validation via `assert vtype in vtypes.TYPES`
+
+These are standard web application input handling patterns, not WebRTC signaling message validation.
+
+### Security Controls Inventory for 17.3.2
+No applicable controls in this scope. Input validation present in the code relates to:
+- HTTP form data parsing for elections/votes (`pages.py` lines 384-399)
+- Date format validation (`pages.py` lines 96-99)
+- Database existence checks (`election.py` via `not_found()`)
+
+None relate to WebRTC signaling message handling.
+
+### Positive Patterns for 17.3.2
+Not applicable — this requirement does not apply to the audited codebase.
+
+---
+
+
+
+## Cross-cutting Architecture Observations
+
+1. **Application Type Mismatch**: The audited code is a **web-based election/voting management application** (Apache Steve voting system). All six ASVS requirements under audit (17.2.5, 17.2.6, 17.2.7, 17.2.8, 17.3.1, 17.3.2) pertain exclusively to WebRTC media servers and signaling servers. **None of these requirements are applicable** to this codebase.
+
+2. **No WebRTC Components Present**: The codebase contains zero WebRTC-related functionality:
+   - No media server (SFU/MCU/recording/gateway)
+   - No SRTP/RTP packet handling
+   - No DTLS implementation or configuration
+   - No SDP parsing or fingerprint validation
+   - No signaling server (WebSocket or otherwise for WebRTC)
+   - No ICE/STUN/TURN infrastructure
+
+3. **Technology Stack**: The application uses:
+   - Python/Quart (async HTTP framework)
+   - SQLite (database)
+   - EZT (template engine)
+   - Standard HTTP/HTTPS for all client-server communication
+
+4. **Other Security Observations** (outside scope of these requirements but noted for completeness):
+   - CSRF token is a hardcoded placeholder (`'placeholder'`) — no actual protection
+   - Multiple `### check authz` placeholders indicate incomplete authorization implementation
+   - `serve_doc()` endpoint has a noted path traversal concern (comment: `### verify the propriety of DOCNAME`)
+   - Debug `print()` statements in production code
+   - State-changing operations (`/do-open/<eid>`, `/do-close/<eid>`) use GET method
+
+## Cross-cutting Recommendations
+
+**Immediate**: No immediate action required for the WebRTC-specific ASVS requirements (17.2.5–17.3.2) as they are not applicable to this application.
+
+**Short-term**: If the organization's security assessment scope includes these ASVS WebRTC requirements, confirm that:
+- The organization does not host any WebRTC media servers or signaling servers elsewhere in its infrastructure
+- If WebRTC services exist in other systems, those systems should be audited against these requirements separately
+
+**Long-term**: Ensure ASVS requirement applicability is determined during audit scoping to avoid misalignment between requirements and target systems. For this election application, more relevant ASVS sections would include:
+- Chapter 4 (Access Control)
+- Chapter 8 (Data Protection)
+- Chapter 9 (Communication Security)
+- Chapter 13 (API and Web Service)
+- Chapter 14 (Configuration)
+        
\ No newline at end of file


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@tooling.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@tooling.apache.org