You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Ol...@Sun.COM on 2006/07/31 11:15:04 UTC
Regression Test Failure! - Derby 426908 - Sun DBTG
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 426908/2006-07-30 19:46:17 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed Tests OK Skip Duration Platform
-------------------------------------------------------
*Jvm: 1.6*
22 728 706 0 107.99% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/DerbyJDK16Jvm1.6/Limited/testSummary-426908.html
Attempted failure analysis in
http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/Failures/DerbyJDK16Jvm1.6/426908.html
*Jvm: 1.5*
5 684 679 2 106.11% CYGWIN_NT-5.1_i686-unknown
6 684 678 2 117.68% CYGWIN_NT-5.2_i686-unknown
NA NA NA NA Linux-2.6.14-1.1644_FC4_i686-i686
4 684 680 2 106.31% Linux-2.6.9-34.ELsmp_x86_64-x86_64
4 684 680 2 183.83% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
5 684 679 2 165.96% SunOS-5.10_sun4u-sparc
5 684 679 2 109.47% SunOS-5.11_i86pc-i386
NA NA NA NA SunOS-5.9_sun4u-sparc
Details in http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/Derby/Limited/testSummary-426908.html
Attempted failure analysis in
http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/Failures/Derby/426908.html
*Jvm: 1.4*
5 678 673 4 99.35% CYGWIN_NT-5.1_i686-unknown
NA NA NA NA Linux-2.6.14-1.1644_FC4_i686-i686
4 678 674 4 113.65% Linux-2.6.9-34.ELsmp_x86_64-x86_64
4 678 674 4 218.95% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/DerbyJvm1.4/Limited/testSummary-426908.html
Attempted failure analysis in
http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/Failures/DerbyJvm1.4/426908.html
Changes in http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/Derby/UpdateInfo/426908.txt
( All results in http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/index.html )
Re: Regression Test Failure! - Derby 426908 - Sun DBTG
Posted by Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com>.
On 7/31/06, Ole.Solberg@sun.com <Ol...@sun.com> wrote:
> *Derby* 426908/2006-07-30 19:46:17 CEST
> *derbyall*
>
> Failed Tests OK Skip Duration Platform
> -------------------------------------------------------
> *Jvm: 1.6*
> 22 728 706 0 107.99% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
> Details in http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/DerbyJDK16Jvm1.6/Limited/testSummary-426908.html
> Attempted failure analysis in
> http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/Failures/DerbyJDK16Jvm1.6/426908.html
I saw these failure and was surprised, but it didn't seem to be
related to anything I was doing in my patch (which hasn't gone in yet,
so there's proof of sorts).
I don't understand why these diffs didn't show up on 7/19's run ( see:
http://www.multinet.no/~solberg/public/Apache/DerbyJDK16Jvm1.6/Limited/derbyall_history.html)
because the files in the harness dir have since only been changed in
what seems to me unrelated ways...
But I am wondering, if maybe one item too many slipped into Sed.java...
It seems to me that this:
searchStrings.addElement("java.sql.SQLException:");
is on purpose getting changed into this:
subStrings.addElement(SQL_EXCEPTION_FILTERED_SUBSTITUTION);
(i.e. private static final String SQL_EXCEPTION_FILTERED_SUBSTITUTION
= "SQL Exception:";)
whereas it seems the jdk14/15 the output may be (see e.g. compressTable.sql):
ERROR 38000: The exception 'java.sql.SQLException: Schema 'GROUP' does
not exist' was thrown while evaluating an expression.
So, maybe the java.sql.SQLException should *not* get filtered?
Just some thoughts.
Myrna