You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Florian MOGA <mo...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/07 12:17:41 UTC

trunk structure - distribution folder

The distributionn folder is destined to take the responsabilities of the
features, distribution and shades folders.

In the distribution folder we already have "all" and "tomcat". What
directory should we use to collect together the projects that describe
collections of jars but which are not, in their own right,
distributions, e.g. core-runtime, base-runtime etc.

Do we think distribution which is assembling set of jars in a given
structure to be consumed by users feat well together with "soft
grouping"  of modules for simplifying consumption ? By bringing all of
this together inside distribution, it might have potential to confuse
people.

Re: trunk structure - distribution folder

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Florian MOGA <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The distributionn folder is destined to take the responsabilities of the
> features, distribution and shades folders.
> In the distribution folder we already have "all" and "tomcat". What
> directory should we use to collect together the projects that describe
> collections of jars but which are not, in their own right,
> distributions, e.g. core-runtime, base-runtime etc.
> Do we think distribution which is assembling set of jars in a given
> structure to be consumed by users feat well together with "soft
> grouping"  of modules for simplifying consumption ? By bringing all of
> this together inside distribution, it might have potential to confuse
> people.

To me, features does not belong to distribution as it's really not
producing an artifact that is going to be released.

-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/