You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> on 2007/02/19 17:16:40 UTC
[VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
The Struts 2.0.6 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-206.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.6/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.6/m2-staging-repository/
Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
list.
As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
to help do the work.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Pedro Herrera <pe...@hotmail.com>.
Beta.
struts2-blank-2.0.6.war doesn´t work !!!
husted wrote:
>
> The Struts 2.0.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-206.html
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.6/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.6/m2-staging-repository/
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work.
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Struts-2.0.6-Quality-tf3253694.html#a9078929
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
At this time, I'm changing my binding vote on 2.0.6 from GA to Beta.
On 2/22/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Here's my own +1 for GA.
>
> That makes the tally
>
> Binding
>
> 3 +1 GA - Patrick Lightbody, Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted.
>
> 1 +1 Beta - Rene Gielen.
>
> Non-Binding
>
> 5 +1 GA - Dave Newton, Matt Raible, Nate Drake, Andre Faria, Philip Luppens.
>
> 1 +1 Beta - Pedro Herrera.
>
> 1 +1 Test Build - cilquirm.
>
> I'll submit the distribution for mirroring and tomorrow make the GA
> announcement to user@.
>
> -Ted.
>
--
HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Vinny <xa...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, really should have sent this to the user list
On 2/28/07, Vinny <xa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> FYI:
> I also don't see the struts2-config-browser-plugin. I had to grab it out
> of
> struts2-all zip file. I do see a struts2-config-browser-plugin in the repo
> with a version of
> 2.0.6-SNAPSHOT, unfortunately it has a dependency for struts 1.3.5 in
> it's POM.
>
>
> On 2/28/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > The struts2-continuations-plugin/ is missing from the maven
> > repositories, builds, and tag for 2.0.6. It was there for 2.0.5. Is
> > that intentional? If not, it should be fixed prior to 2.0.7.
> >
> >
> > David
> > .
> > Ted Husted wrote:
> > > Here's my own +1 for GA.
> > >
> > > That makes the tally
> > >
> > > Binding
> > >
> > > 3 +1 GA - Patrick Lightbody, Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted.
> > >
> > > 1 +1 Beta - Rene Gielen.
> > >
> > > Non-Binding
> > >
> > > 5 +1 GA - Dave Newton, Matt Raible, Nate Drake, Andre Faria, Philip
> > > Luppens.
> > >
> > > 1 +1 Beta - Pedro Herrera.
> > >
> > > 1 +1 Test Build - cilquirm.
> > >
> > > I'll submit the distribution for mirroring and tomorrow make the GA
> > > announcement to user@.
> > >
> > > -Ted.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ghetto Java: http://www.ghettojava.com
--
Ghetto Java: http://www.ghettojava.com
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Vinny <xa...@gmail.com>.
FYI:
I also don't see the struts2-config-browser-plugin. I had to grab it out of
struts2-all zip file. I do see a struts2-config-browser-plugin in the repo
with a version of
2.0.6-SNAPSHOT, unfortunately it has a dependency for struts 1.3.5 in it's
POM.
On 2/28/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> The struts2-continuations-plugin/ is missing from the maven
> repositories, builds, and tag for 2.0.6. It was there for 2.0.5. Is
> that intentional? If not, it should be fixed prior to 2.0.7.
>
>
> David
> .
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > Here's my own +1 for GA.
> >
> > That makes the tally
> >
> > Binding
> >
> > 3 +1 GA - Patrick Lightbody, Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted.
> >
> > 1 +1 Beta - Rene Gielen.
> >
> > Non-Binding
> >
> > 5 +1 GA - Dave Newton, Matt Raible, Nate Drake, Andre Faria, Philip
> > Luppens.
> >
> > 1 +1 Beta - Pedro Herrera.
> >
> > 1 +1 Test Build - cilquirm.
> >
> > I'll submit the distribution for mirroring and tomorrow make the GA
> > announcement to user@.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
Ghetto Java: http://www.ghettojava.com
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
It's broken, so we pushed it to the sandbox until someone takes an
interest. It should have been removed prior to 2.0.5.
-Ted.
On 2/28/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> The struts2-continuations-plugin/ is missing from the maven
> repositories, builds, and tag for 2.0.6. It was there for 2.0.5. Is
> that intentional? If not, it should be fixed prior to 2.0.7.
>
>
> David
> .
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > Here's my own +1 for GA.
> >
> > That makes the tally
> >
> > Binding
> >
> > 3 +1 GA - Patrick Lightbody, Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted.
> >
> > 1 +1 Beta - Rene Gielen.
> >
> > Non-Binding
> >
> > 5 +1 GA - Dave Newton, Matt Raible, Nate Drake, Andre Faria, Philip
> > Luppens.
> >
> > 1 +1 Beta - Pedro Herrera.
> >
> > 1 +1 Test Build - cilquirm.
> >
> > I'll submit the distribution for mirroring and tomorrow make the GA
> > announcement to user@.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
HTH, Ted.
* http://www.husted.com/struts/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
The struts2-continuations-plugin/ is missing from the maven
repositories, builds, and tag for 2.0.6. It was there for 2.0.5. Is
that intentional? If not, it should be fixed prior to 2.0.7.
David
.
Ted Husted wrote:
> Here's my own +1 for GA.
>
> That makes the tally
>
> Binding
>
> 3 +1 GA - Patrick Lightbody, Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted.
>
> 1 +1 Beta - Rene Gielen.
>
> Non-Binding
>
> 5 +1 GA - Dave Newton, Matt Raible, Nate Drake, Andre Faria, Philip
> Luppens.
>
> 1 +1 Beta - Pedro Herrera.
>
> 1 +1 Test Build - cilquirm.
>
> I'll submit the distribution for mirroring and tomorrow make the GA
> announcement to user@.
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
At this time, I'm changing my binding vote on 2.0.6 from GA to Beta.
On 2/22/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Here's my own +1 for GA.
>
> That makes the tally
>
> Binding
>
> 3 +1 GA - Patrick Lightbody, Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted.
>
> 1 +1 Beta - Rene Gielen.
>
> Non-Binding
>
> 5 +1 GA - Dave Newton, Matt Raible, Nate Drake, Andre Faria, Philip Luppens.
>
> 1 +1 Beta - Pedro Herrera.
>
> 1 +1 Test Build - cilquirm.
>
> I'll submit the distribution for mirroring and tomorrow make the GA
> announcement to user@.
>
> -Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
Here's my own +1 for GA.
That makes the tally
Binding
3 +1 GA - Patrick Lightbody, Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted.
1 +1 Beta - Rene Gielen.
Non-Binding
5 +1 GA - Dave Newton, Matt Raible, Nate Drake, Andre Faria, Philip Luppens.
1 +1 Beta - Pedro Herrera.
1 +1 Test Build - cilquirm.
I'll submit the distribution for mirroring and tomorrow make the GA
announcement to user@.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Philip Luppens <ph...@gmail.com>.
> [ x ] General Availability (GA)
On 2/19/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> The Struts 2.0.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-206.html
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.6/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.6/m2-staging-repository/
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work.
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
iDTV System Engineer
"Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a
violent psychopath who knows where you live." - John F. Woods
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
On 2/21/07, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> I completely agree. It is unrealistic for an active project that uses this
> particular release process to find/fix zero bugs and make zero improvements
> from the time the test build is created to when it is voted upon.
We've started to call the votes as soon as the test build is
available, so there isn't any lag time. Hopefully, people here have
already been working with the HEAD, so it should be a final shakedown.
> The metric should be, even knowing what you do, if you tested the release and
> find it meets your standard of quality. Since this particular issue was
> present in WW for many GA releases, I don't think it should affect the
> quality vote for this release, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't roll
> 2.0.7 quickly and also possibly make it GA.
Just to touch all the bases, releases are a majority vote, and all we
need is three binding +1s and more +1s and -1s. So, even if someone
were to apply a tougher metric, a binding beta vote would not stop a
GA, so long as we had more binding GA votes than beta or test-build
votes.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
On 2/21/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> And, honestly, if this issue has been lurking for so long,
> undoubtedly, there are going to be others. But, we are not going to
> catch those until more people try the product. At this point, I don't
> believe we are going to hook many more people with beta releases. The
> best strategy might be to prepare for a succession of bi-weekly
> milestones, which would hopefully proceed directly to GA.
I completely agree. It is unrealistic for an active project that uses this
particular release process to find/fix zero bugs and make zero improvements
from the time the test build is created to when it is voted upon. The
metric should be, even knowing what you do, if you tested the release and
find it meets your standard of quality. Since this particular issue was
present in WW for many GA releases, I don't think it should affect the
quality vote for this release, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't roll
2.0.7quickly and also possibly make it GA.
Remember, a release isn't about perfect; if we get super picky, we'll never
get a GA release out. It is about determining if you would put this code
into production for your applications.
Don
Of course, in the meantime, the trunk is open for 2.1.x development.
> From prior discussions, the big tickets there seem to be extracting
> Ajax/Dojo and portlets to plugins. IMHO, those changes alone would be
> enough to get stared on the next series.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 2/21/07, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
> > After all, if we plan to push out a 2.0.7 within one or two weeks after
> > doing 2.0.6 GA, the problem might not be that big. But if it takes
> longer,
> > I would still vote for not labeling 2.0.6 for GA.
> >
> > - Rene
> >
> > >
> > > On 2/21/07, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Am Di, 20.02.2007, 16:17, schrieb Nate Drake:
> > >> > [X] Beta
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Due to WW-1747.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Finally, WW-1747 and the related issues should be fixed now. We've
> now
> > >> got
> > >> additional tests in place for all reported issues, and they all pass
> > >> (yes,
> > >> even no broken build 8-).
> > >>
> > >> My vote is
> > >>
> > >> [x] Beta
> > >> for 2.0.6 as is
> > >>
> > >> [x] GA
> > >> for 2.0.6 with WW-1747 patch included (2.0.7 ?)
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> - Rene
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted.
> * http://www.husted.com/struts/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [s2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
There would be no reason for it to take longer. Along with WW-1747,
there are a number of quick and harmless fixes on the 2.0.7 TODO list.
Given something to put in the release notes, I'm up for rolling a
milestone on any given Sunday.
And, honestly, if this issue has been lurking for so long,
undoubtedly, there are going to be others. But, we are not going to
catch those until more people try the product. At this point, I don't
believe we are going to hook many more people with beta releases. The
best strategy might be to prepare for a succession of bi-weekly
milestones, which would hopefully proceed directly to GA.
Of course, in the meantime, the trunk is open for 2.1.x development.
>From prior discussions, the big tickets there seem to be extracting
Ajax/Dojo and portlets to plugins. IMHO, those changes alone would be
enough to get stared on the next series.
-Ted.
On 2/21/07, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
> After all, if we plan to push out a 2.0.7 within one or two weeks after
> doing 2.0.6 GA, the problem might not be that big. But if it takes longer,
> I would still vote for not labeling 2.0.6 for GA.
>
> - Rene
>
> >
> > On 2/21/07, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Am Di, 20.02.2007, 16:17, schrieb Nate Drake:
> >> > [X] Beta
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Due to WW-1747.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Finally, WW-1747 and the related issues should be fixed now. We've now
> >> got
> >> additional tests in place for all reported issues, and they all pass
> >> (yes,
> >> even no broken build 8-).
> >>
> >> My vote is
> >>
> >> [x] Beta
> >> for 2.0.6 as is
> >>
> >> [x] GA
> >> for 2.0.6 with WW-1747 patch included (2.0.7 ?)
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> - Rene
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
HTH, Ted.
* http://www.husted.com/struts/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>.
Am Mi, 21.02.2007, 12:59, schrieb Ted Husted:
> Were the problems associated with WW-1747 restricted to non-string types
> only?
>
Not solely. Also, there are problems with with collection handling (no
matter which type of objects found in collection) causing no options being
rendered as selected in multiple mode. Another issue is about mixing
String and non String types for option items and result item. For the pure
non-string type problem, there is a good chance of getting freemarker
errors for quite common usecases of the simple select tag.
> We can't patch 2.0.6 in this way, but I think a 2.0.7 was always a
> foregone conclusion. There are a number of worthwhile tweaks on the
> 2.0.7 TODO list. I'd expect there to be several 2.0.x GA releases, as
> we find "i's to dot and t's to cross".
>
> -Ted.
I see your point with the need to bring this into a new release to be
clean. But I'm not sure if we should label 2.0.6 GA with clear
conscience while knowing that approximately 10-20% of all usages of a
select tag by early adopters will fail either with errors or with unusable
results (since preselected values are not shown), if they don't use the
toString() workaround.
The tag itself seems to be broken for quite a long time now, it is quite
astonishing the problems were not reported earlier. But if we go GA now
without fixing the full issue, we can expect to receive lots of reports on
that issue quite soon :)
After all, if we plan to push out a 2.0.7 within one or two weeks after
doing 2.0.6 GA, the problem might not be that big. But if it takes longer,
I would still vote for not labeling 2.0.6 for GA.
- Rene
>
> On 2/21/07, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
>>
>> Am Di, 20.02.2007, 16:17, schrieb Nate Drake:
>> > [X] Beta
>> >
>> >
>> > Due to WW-1747.
>> >
>>
>> Finally, WW-1747 and the related issues should be fixed now. We've now
>> got
>> additional tests in place for all reported issues, and they all pass
>> (yes,
>> even no broken build 8-).
>>
>> My vote is
>>
>> [x] Beta
>> for 2.0.6 as is
>>
>> [x] GA
>> for 2.0.6 with WW-1747 patch included (2.0.7 ?)
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Rene
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
Were the problems associated with WW-1747 restricted to non-string types only?
We can't patch 2.0.6 in this way, but I think a 2.0.7 was always a
foregone conclusion. There are a number of worthwhile tweaks on the
2.0.7 TODO list. I'd expect there to be several 2.0.x GA releases, as
we find "i's to dot and t's to cross".
-Ted.
On 2/21/07, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
>
> Am Di, 20.02.2007, 16:17, schrieb Nate Drake:
> > [X] Beta
> >
> >
> > Due to WW-1747.
> >
>
> Finally, WW-1747 and the related issues should be fixed now. We've now got
> additional tests in place for all reported issues, and they all pass (yes,
> even no broken build 8-).
>
> My vote is
>
> [x] Beta
> for 2.0.6 as is
>
> [x] GA
> for 2.0.6 with WW-1747 patch included (2.0.7 ?)
>
> Regards,
> - Rene
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>.
Am Di, 20.02.2007, 16:17, schrieb Nate Drake:
> [X] Beta
>
>
> Due to WW-1747.
>
Finally, WW-1747 and the related issues should be fixed now. We've now got
additional tests in place for all reported issues, and they all pass (yes,
even no broken build 8-).
My vote is
[x] Beta
for 2.0.6 as is
[x] GA
for 2.0.6 with WW-1747 patch included (2.0.7 ?)
Regards,
- Rene
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Nate Drake <nd...@gmail.com>.
[X] Beta
Due to WW-1747.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by mraible <ma...@raibledesigns.com>.
husted wrote:
>
> [X] General Availability (GA)
>
Tested with AppFuse 2.x (JDK 6, Maven 2.0.5, Tomcat 5.5.17 on OS X) and all
tests pass.
Matt
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Struts-2.0.6-Quality-tf3253694.html#a9054691
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by André Faria <an...@mandic.com.br>.
[X] General Availability (GA)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Rainer Hermanns <he...@aixcept.de>.
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] General Availability (GA)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
That should be fixed already on the 2.0.X branch.
regards
musachy
On 2/21/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> If you are building from the tag, then you have to build it twice to
> get the TLD.
>
> There a known timing issue in the Maven build.
>
> The TLD is in the distribution.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 2/21/07, cilquirm <fo...@opensymphony.com> wrote:
> > [X] Leave at test build
> >
> > Checked out 2.0.6 from
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_0_6/
> >
> > and i noticed that the struts-tags.tld file is not in core.jar.
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Posted via Jive Forums
> >
> http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=65672&messageID=126226#126226
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted.
> * http://www.husted.com/struts/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
If you are building from the tag, then you have to build it twice to
get the TLD.
There a known timing issue in the Maven build.
The TLD is in the distribution.
-Ted.
On 2/21/07, cilquirm <fo...@opensymphony.com> wrote:
> [X] Leave at test build
>
> Checked out 2.0.6 from
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_0_6/
>
> and i noticed that the struts-tags.tld file is not in core.jar.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Posted via Jive Forums
> http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=65672&messageID=126226#126226
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
HTH, Ted.
* http://www.husted.com/struts/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by cilquirm <fo...@opensymphony.com>.
[X] Leave at test build
Checked out 2.0.6 from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_0_6/
and i noticed that the struts-tags.tld file is not in core.jar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=65672&messageID=126226#126226
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
--- Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> [ X ] General Availability (GA)
So you get at least one user vote :)
Dave
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.6 Quality
Posted by Patrick Lightbody <fo...@opensymphony.com>.
+1 for GA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=65672&messageID=125490#125490
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org