You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> on 2013/10/31 19:05:19 UTC
Root table's tablet assignment failure on startup
I'm not sure if I did something bad the last time I stopped my 1.6.0
instance, but I figure I'll mention it here first.
Started up a 1.6.0 instance that I had before. Root table didn't come
online because it couldn't load its tablet because the
/accumulo/${instance_id}/root_tablet/dir node in ZK doesn't exist.
I didn't want to just wipe it in case this is an actual problem. Thoughts?
Re: Root table's tablet assignment failure on startup
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Cool. Thanks, Keith.
On Oct 31, 2013 4:33 PM, "Keith Turner" <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> Its not a a problem, thats a result of fixing ACCUMULO-1766.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if I did something bad the last time I stopped my 1.6.0
> > instance, but I figure I'll mention it here first.
> >
> > Started up a 1.6.0 instance that I had before. Root table didn't come
> > online because it couldn't load its tablet because the
> > /accumulo/${instance_id}/root_**tablet/dir node in ZK doesn't exist.
> >
> > I didn't want to just wipe it in case this is an actual problem.
> Thoughts?
> >
>
Re: Root table's tablet assignment failure on startup
Posted by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>.
Its not a a problem, thats a result of fixing ACCUMULO-1766.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if I did something bad the last time I stopped my 1.6.0
> instance, but I figure I'll mention it here first.
>
> Started up a 1.6.0 instance that I had before. Root table didn't come
> online because it couldn't load its tablet because the
> /accumulo/${instance_id}/root_**tablet/dir node in ZK doesn't exist.
>
> I didn't want to just wipe it in case this is an actual problem. Thoughts?
>