You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by "Peter M. Goldstein" <pe...@yahoo.com> on 2010/07/06 08:59:12 UTC
Outstanding JIRA Bugs/Question
Hi,
I submitted a few JIRA issues a couple of weeks ago and I was hoping to get
a committer to comment on and/or apply the submitted patches. Specifically,
the issues were:
i) MAHOUT-428
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-428> - This should be a
pretty safe patch, considering it is patterned on another, already resolved,
bug.
ii) MAHOUT-426
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-426> - This patch basically
adds some safety nets to the Mahout command script, ensuring that it doesn't
run the hadoop branch unless there's a Job file available.
iii) MAHOUT-427
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-427> - This issue is a
question about the "-core" argument to the Mahout command script. I
couldn't find this documented on the wiki, and was hoping someone could shed
some light. Any clarification would be appreciated.
I'd especially like to get 428 into trunk, so I don't have to maintain a
patched version on my EC2 image.
Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks.
--Peter
Re: Outstanding JIRA Bugs/Question
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Peter.
I just committed and resolved 428. Drew looks like he has one of the others
and the third looks like it requires a bit of review.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Peter M. Goldstein <
peter_m_goldstein@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I submitted a few JIRA issues a couple of weeks ago and I was hoping to get
> a committer to comment on and/or apply the submitted patches.
> Specifically,
> the issues were:
>
>
>
> i) MAHOUT-428
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-428> - This should be a
> pretty safe patch, considering it is patterned on another, already
> resolved,
> bug.
>
> ii) MAHOUT-426
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-426> - This patch basically
> adds some safety nets to the Mahout command script, ensuring that it
> doesn't
> run the hadoop branch unless there's a Job file available.
>
> iii) MAHOUT-427
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-427> - This issue is a
> question about the "-core" argument to the Mahout command script. I
> couldn't find this documented on the wiki, and was hoping someone could
> shed
> some light. Any clarification would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> I'd especially like to get 428 into trunk, so I don't have to maintain a
> patched version on my EC2 image.
>
>
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --Peter
>
>
Re: Outstanding JIRA Bugs/Question
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
No I wasn't suggesting changing or reverting anything.
On Jul 6, 2010 6:08 PM, "Ted Dunning" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> Should I revert that patch?
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can anyone who worked on this code comment?
>> They do seem minor.
>> 428 would also be solved by moving to the standard Job superclass.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Peter M. Goldstein
>> <pe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I submitted a few JIRA issues a couple of weeks ago and I was hoping to
>> get
>> > a committer to comment on and/or apply the submitted patches.
>> Specifically,
>> > the issues were:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > i) MAHOUT-428
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-428> - This should be a
>> > pretty safe patch, considering it is patterned on another, already
>> resolved,
>> > bug.
>> >
>> > ii) MAHOUT-426
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-426> - This patch
>> basically
>> > adds some safety nets to the Mahout command script, ensuring that it
>> doesn't
>> > run the hadoop branch unless there's a Job file available.
>> >
>> > iii) MAHOUT-427
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-427> - This issue is a
>> > question about the "-core" argument to the Mahout command script. I
>> > couldn't find this documented on the wiki, and was hoping someone could
>> shed
>> > some light. Any clarification would be appreciated.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I'd especially like to get 428 into trunk, so I don't have to maintain
a
>> > patched version on my EC2 image.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Any comments would be appreciated.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --Peter
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: Outstanding JIRA Bugs/Question
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
Sean,
Should I revert that patch?
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can anyone who worked on this code comment?
> They do seem minor.
> 428 would also be solved by moving to the standard Job superclass.
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Peter M. Goldstein
> <pe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I submitted a few JIRA issues a couple of weeks ago and I was hoping to
> get
> > a committer to comment on and/or apply the submitted patches.
> Specifically,
> > the issues were:
> >
> >
> >
> > i) MAHOUT-428
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-428> - This should be a
> > pretty safe patch, considering it is patterned on another, already
> resolved,
> > bug.
> >
> > ii) MAHOUT-426
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-426> - This patch
> basically
> > adds some safety nets to the Mahout command script, ensuring that it
> doesn't
> > run the hadoop branch unless there's a Job file available.
> >
> > iii) MAHOUT-427
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-427> - This issue is a
> > question about the "-core" argument to the Mahout command script. I
> > couldn't find this documented on the wiki, and was hoping someone could
> shed
> > some light. Any clarification would be appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'd especially like to get 428 into trunk, so I don't have to maintain a
> > patched version on my EC2 image.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any comments would be appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > --Peter
> >
> >
>
Re: Outstanding JIRA Bugs/Question
Posted by Drew Farris <dr...@gmail.com>.
Commented on JIRA, I'm hoping I can take a look more closely at these tonight.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can anyone who worked on this code comment?
> They do seem minor.
> 428 would also be solved by moving to the standard Job superclass.
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Peter M. Goldstein
> <pe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I submitted a few JIRA issues a couple of weeks ago and I was hoping to get
>> a committer to comment on and/or apply the submitted patches. Specifically,
>> the issues were:
>>
>>
>>
>> i) MAHOUT-428
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-428> - This should be a
>> pretty safe patch, considering it is patterned on another, already resolved,
>> bug.
>>
>> ii) MAHOUT-426
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-426> - This patch basically
>> adds some safety nets to the Mahout command script, ensuring that it doesn't
>> run the hadoop branch unless there's a Job file available.
>>
>> iii) MAHOUT-427
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-427> - This issue is a
>> question about the "-core" argument to the Mahout command script. I
>> couldn't find this documented on the wiki, and was hoping someone could shed
>> some light. Any clarification would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd especially like to get 428 into trunk, so I don't have to maintain a
>> patched version on my EC2 image.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any comments would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> --Peter
>>
>>
>
Re: Outstanding JIRA Bugs/Question
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Can anyone who worked on this code comment?
They do seem minor.
428 would also be solved by moving to the standard Job superclass.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Peter M. Goldstein
<pe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I submitted a few JIRA issues a couple of weeks ago and I was hoping to get
> a committer to comment on and/or apply the submitted patches. Specifically,
> the issues were:
>
>
>
> i) MAHOUT-428
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-428> - This should be a
> pretty safe patch, considering it is patterned on another, already resolved,
> bug.
>
> ii) MAHOUT-426
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-426> - This patch basically
> adds some safety nets to the Mahout command script, ensuring that it doesn't
> run the hadoop branch unless there's a Job file available.
>
> iii) MAHOUT-427
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-427> - This issue is a
> question about the "-core" argument to the Mahout command script. I
> couldn't find this documented on the wiki, and was hoping someone could shed
> some light. Any clarification would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> I'd especially like to get 428 into trunk, so I don't have to maintain a
> patched version on my EC2 image.
>
>
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --Peter
>
>