Re: svn commit: r926362 - /harmony/enhanced/branches/java6/drlvm/

[Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>]

In case anyone is wondering (I know I would be but perhaps it is just
me) then the reason I did this copy rather than doing the merge of the
equivalent change from federated trunk to the federated branches/java6
tree is that I think committing the merge would have resulted in
transmitting the whole of drlvm where as the copy happens on the server.

It will all come out the same when I finish doing the merges shortly.

Regards,
 Mark.

In message <20...@eris.apache.org>, hindessm@apache.org
writes:
>
> Author: hindessm
> Date: Mon Mar 22 21:47:14 2010
> New Revision: 926362
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=926362&view=rev
> Log:
> Copy drlvm/trunk (there was no drlvm java6 branch) to branches/java6/drlvm.
> 
> Added:
>     harmony/enhanced/branches/java6/drlvm/   (props changed)
>       - copied from r926361, harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/
> 
> Propchange: harmony/enhanced/branches/java6/drlvm/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --- svn:ignore (added)
> +++ svn:ignore Mon Mar 22 21:47:14 2010
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +.cdtproject
> +.project
> +.settings
> +deploy
> 
> Propchange: harmony/enhanced/branches/java6/drlvm/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --- svn:mergeinfo (added)
> +++ svn:mergeinfo Mon Mar 22 21:47:14 2010
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +/harmony/enhanced/trunk/working_vm:476396-920147
> +/incubator/harmony/enhanced/trunk/working_vm:423974-476394
>