You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Jan Høydahl (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/05/06 01:03:49 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3439) Add "content" field to example
schema to make SolrCell easier to use out of the box
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13269080#comment-13269080 ]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-3439:
-----------------------------------
I agree that this makes sense, and will not have any cost.
We could also make the Velocity GUI smart enough to detect whether the document is a "product" document, and output name, manufacturer, price, inStock etc.. OR whether it is a Tika doc or HTML in which case it prints the title, dynamic teaser, document size, document type/MIME etc.
Finally we could add some PDFs to the exampledocs folder!
Do you want to attempt a first patch?
> Add "content" field to example schema to make SolrCell easier to use out of the box
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3439
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3439
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib - Solr Cell (Tika extraction), Schema and Analysis
> Reporter: Jack Krupansky
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Currently, SolrCell is configured to map Tika "content" (the main body of a document) to the "text" field which is the indexed-only (not stored) catch-all for default queries. That searches fine, but doesn't show the document content in the results, sometimes leading users to think that something is wrong. Sure, the user can easily add the field (and this is documented), but it would be a better user experience to have such a basic feature work right out of the box without any config editing and without the need for the user to read the fine print in the documentation.
> I propose that we add the "content" field to the example schema in the section of fields already defined to support SolrCell metadata. It would be stored and indexed.
> I further propose that a copyField be added for the "title", "description", (and maybe a couple of others) and "content" fields to add them to the "text" field for searching. Again, trying to improve the out of the box user experience. It also simplifies testing - less setup.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org