You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@commons.apache.org by Emmanuel PILLANT <ep...@sii.fr> on 2008/02/26 09:49:13 UTC
Hi SCXML community !
Hi guys !
I want first congrats you for SCXML, which is a very usefull tool.
We are currently using the version 0.7, and i have a question about the use
of the "digester" with SCXML. Into your tests, you are using the method
digest(), but this method is deprecated. The javadoc indicates that we must
use the method parse() instead but this is not working.
Do I need to use the method digest() or can I use parse() method ? And if
the method parse() can be used, what must I change in my SCXML file to make
this method works ?
Thank's for your help.
Manu
Re: Hi SCXML community !
Posted by Emmanuel PILLANT <ep...@sii.fr>.
Ok Rahul.
We will continue to use the digest() method, until the version 1.0 is
released.
Thank you very much for your answer.
Manu
On 27/02/2008, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/26/08, Emmanuel PILLANT <ep...@sii.fr> wrote:
> > Hi guys !
> >
> > I want first congrats you for SCXML, which is a very usefull tool.
> >
> > We are currently using the version 0.7, and i have a question about the
> use
> > of the "digester" with SCXML. Into your tests, you are using the method
> > digest(), but this method is deprecated. The javadoc indicates that we
> must
> > use the method parse() instead but this is not working.
> >
> > Do I need to use the method digest() or can I use parse() method ? And
> if
> > the method parse() can be used, what must I change in my SCXML file to
> make
> > this method works ?
> >
>
> <snip/>
>
> The digest() methods will not be removed until v1.0 (whenever that
> release happens -- no plan yet). So there isn't an immediate urgency
> to use to new parser. Many tests use the deprecated methods since we
> still need to test the old parser.
>
> The deprecation is a gentle reminder to begin to upgrade (older
> versions of) SCXML documents in line with the current version of the
> W3C WD:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-scxml-20070221/
>
> Once that is done, the new parser can be used.
>
> For specific answers about the bits not working when you make the
> change, please post brief and relevant SCXML snippets.
>
> -Rahul
>
>
>
> > Thank's for your help.
> >
> > Manu
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: Hi SCXML community !
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 2/26/08, Emmanuel PILLANT <ep...@sii.fr> wrote:
> Hi guys !
>
> I want first congrats you for SCXML, which is a very usefull tool.
>
> We are currently using the version 0.7, and i have a question about the use
> of the "digester" with SCXML. Into your tests, you are using the method
> digest(), but this method is deprecated. The javadoc indicates that we must
> use the method parse() instead but this is not working.
>
> Do I need to use the method digest() or can I use parse() method ? And if
> the method parse() can be used, what must I change in my SCXML file to make
> this method works ?
>
<snip/>
The digest() methods will not be removed until v1.0 (whenever that
release happens -- no plan yet). So there isn't an immediate urgency
to use to new parser. Many tests use the deprecated methods since we
still need to test the old parser.
The deprecation is a gentle reminder to begin to upgrade (older
versions of) SCXML documents in line with the current version of the
W3C WD:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-scxml-20070221/
Once that is done, the new parser can be used.
For specific answers about the bits not working when you make the
change, please post brief and relevant SCXML snippets.
-Rahul
> Thank's for your help.
>
> Manu
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org