You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Manoj Kumar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/06/23 01:32:16 UTC
[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SPARK-14351) Optimize
ImpurityAggregator for decision trees
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Manoj Kumar updated SPARK-14351:
--------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: Here are my thoughts: Also ccing [~sethah] since he has seen this part of the codebase quite a few times to get some ideas.
Right now, a copy of size *statsSize* is created that is sliced from *allStats* for every instantiation of *ImpurityCalculator*. The reason to do this is because there are calls to *add* and *subtract* that modify the *ImpurityCalculator* inplace. However the calls to *add* or *subtract* are very less as compared to the class instantiations. (roughly called one time for every 2 times *ImpurityCalculator* is instantiated.
I see two alternatives.
1. Pass the view directly to the *ImpurityCalculator* and make a copy whenever *add* or *subtract* is called.
2. Pass *allStats*, *offset*, *offset + statsSize* to the *impurityCalculator* and make a copy of *allStats* whenever *add* or *subtract* is called.
Both will involve making *stats* a def, which would provide a copy whenever it is being called. The first one is more more favourable because the size of *allStats* is huge. WDYT?)
> Optimize ImpurityAggregator for decision trees
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-14351
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14351
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ML
> Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>
> {{RandomForest.binsToBestSplit}} currently takes a large amount of time. Based on some quick profiling, I believe a big chunk of this is spent in {{ImpurityAggregator.getCalculator}} (which seems to make unnecessary Array copies) and {{RandomForest.calculateImpurityStats}}.
> This JIRA is for:
> * Doing more profiling to confirm that unnecessary time is being spent in some of these methods.
> * Optimizing the implementation
> * Profiling again to confirm the speedups
> Local profiling for large enough examples should suffice, especially since the optimizations should not need to change the amount of data communicated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org