https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-96

[Sumit Mohanty <sm...@hortonworks.com>]

What do you think about - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-96

The current metainfo structure for an application is contained within

<services>
    <service>
       ...
    </service>
</services>

The docs do not match the above (a JIRA was not fixed during the last
release). We have documented the structure to be

<application>
       ...
</application>

but did not make the code change to reflect that.

Anyway, <application>...</application> seem preferable as Slider refers to
YARN applications. If there is no objection then I will modify the code as
well the packages to use <application>...</application>.

This is a breaking change but not a significant one and IMO, Slider is
still in the early stages to absorb it easily.

On related note, if you have other feedback on the naming conventions used
in metainfo.xml please mention it in the JIRA or create new JIRAs.

-Sumit

-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-96

[Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>]

Makes sense. Best to make these changes earlier than later as well.

SGTM

On 6/24/14, 1:58 PM, Sumit Mohanty wrote:
> What do you think about - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-96
>
> The current metainfo structure for an application is contained within
>
> <services>
>      <service>
>         ...
>      </service>
> </services>
>
> The docs do not match the above (a JIRA was not fixed during the last
> release). We have documented the structure to be
>
> <application>
>         ...
> </application>
>
> but did not make the code change to reflect that.
>
> Anyway, <application>...</application> seem preferable as Slider refers to
> YARN applications. If there is no objection then I will modify the code as
> well the packages to use <application>...</application>.
>
> This is a breaking change but not a significant one and IMO, Slider is
> still in the early stages to absorb it easily.
>
> On related note, if you have other feedback on the naming conventions used
> in metainfo.xml please mention it in the JIRA or create new JIRAs.
>
> -Sumit
>