You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@zeppelin.apache.org by Richard Xin <ri...@yahoo.com> on 2017/07/20 00:47:28 UTC
Zeppelin notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo
for newly installed Zeppelin (0.7.2), I renamed zeppelin-site.xml.template to zeppelin-site.xml, and restart zeppelin, zeppelin-site.xml already have the following enabled:
<property>
<name>zeppelin.notebook.storage</name>
<value>org.apache.zeppelin.notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo</value>
<description>versioned notebook persistence layer implementation</description>
</property>
looks like local git repo is enabled, can this be point to remote git repo? such as github.com or even S3 will be great.Thanks,Richard
Re: Zeppelin notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo
Posted by Khalid Huseynov <kh...@zepl.com>.
right, S3 doesn't support versioning at the moment. Thanks for opening the
issue to support remote git repo, I'll comment on issue for more details.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Richard Xin <ri...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> ok, I don't think Zeppelin supports remote git repo, I have filed a Jira
> request to put to the wish list, hope it gets fixed soon ZEPPELIN-2802
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2802>.
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Richard
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, July 20, 2017, 11:28:41 AM PDT, Richard Xin <
> richardxin168@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Khalid, thanks for the reply.
> the problem I am facing is we could use either local git or S3 without git
> support. Any idea how I could get version control on S3?
>
> if I change storage to S3, I can't use version control.
>
> -Richard
>
> On Thursday, July 20, 2017, 12:39:05 AM PDT, Khalid Huseynov <
> khalid@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Actually that setting is only for local storage that allows git/revision
> related actions (e.g. commit, change revision). There's a separate setting
> for S3 though, you can find details in here
> <https://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.7.2/storage/storage.html#notebook-storage-in-s3>
> .
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Richard Xin <ri...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> for newly installed Zeppelin (0.7.2), I renamed zeppelin-site.xml.template
> to zeppelin-site.xml, and restart zeppelin, zeppelin-site.xml already have
> the following enabled:
>
> <property>
> <name>zeppelin.notebook. storage</name>
> <value>org.apache.zeppelin. notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo< /value>
> <description>versioned notebook persistence layer
> implementation</description>
> </property>
>
> looks like local git repo is enabled, can this be point to remote git
> repo? such as github.com or even S3 will be great.
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
>
Re: Zeppelin notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo
Posted by Richard Xin <ri...@yahoo.com>.
ok, I don't think Zeppelin supports remote git repo, I have filed a Jira request to put to the wish list, hope it gets fixed soon ZEPPELIN-2802.
Thanks,-Richard
On Thursday, July 20, 2017, 11:28:41 AM PDT, Richard Xin <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Khalid, thanks for the reply.the problem I am facing is we could use either local git or S3 without git support. Any idea how I could get version control on S3?
if I change storage to S3, I can't use version control.
-Richard
On Thursday, July 20, 2017, 12:39:05 AM PDT, Khalid Huseynov <kh...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
Actually that setting is only for local storage that allows git/revision related actions (e.g. commit, change revision). There's a separate setting for S3 though, you can find details in here.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Richard Xin <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
for newly installed Zeppelin (0.7.2), I renamed zeppelin-site.xml.template to zeppelin-site.xml, and restart zeppelin, zeppelin-site.xml already have the following enabled:
<property>
<name>zeppelin.notebook. storage</name>
<value>org.apache.zeppelin. notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo< /value>
<description>versioned notebook persistence layer implementation</description>
</property>
looks like local git repo is enabled, can this be point to remote git repo? such as github.com or even S3 will be great.Thanks,Richard
Re: Zeppelin notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo
Posted by Richard Xin <ri...@yahoo.com>.
Khalid, thanks for the reply.the problem I am facing is we could use either local git or S3 without git support. Any idea how I could get version control on S3?
if I change storage to S3, I can't use version control.
-Richard
On Thursday, July 20, 2017, 12:39:05 AM PDT, Khalid Huseynov <kh...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Richard,
Actually that setting is only for local storage that allows git/revision related actions (e.g. commit, change revision). There's a separate setting for S3 though, you can find details in here.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Richard Xin <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
for newly installed Zeppelin (0.7.2), I renamed zeppelin-site.xml.template to zeppelin-site.xml, and restart zeppelin, zeppelin-site.xml already have the following enabled:
<property>
<name>zeppelin.notebook. storage</name>
<value>org.apache.zeppelin. notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo< /value>
<description>versioned notebook persistence layer implementation</description>
</property>
looks like local git repo is enabled, can this be point to remote git repo? such as github.com or even S3 will be great.Thanks,Richard
Re: Zeppelin notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo
Posted by Khalid Huseynov <kh...@apache.org>.
Hi Richard,
Actually that setting is only for local storage that allows git/revision
related actions (e.g. commit, change revision). There's a separate setting
for S3 though, you can find details in here
<https://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.7.2/storage/storage.html#notebook-storage-in-s3>
.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Richard Xin <ri...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> for newly installed Zeppelin (0.7.2), I renamed zeppelin-site.xml.template
> to zeppelin-site.xml, and restart zeppelin, zeppelin-site.xml already have
> the following enabled:
>
> <property>
> <name>zeppelin.notebook.storage</name>
> <value>org.apache.zeppelin.notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo</value>
> <description>versioned notebook persistence layer
> implementation</description>
> </property>
>
> looks like local git repo is enabled, can this be point to remote git
> repo? such as github.com or even S3 will be great.
> Thanks,
> Richard
>