You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/12/20 17:47:38 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37980] New: - When using FOP with -noedit fo:basic-links get broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37980>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37980

           Summary: When using FOP with -noedit fo:basic-links get broken
           Product: Fop
           Version: 1.0dev
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: major
          Priority: P2
         Component: pdf
        AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: ono@java.pl


Ehh.. sorry... another bug submission from me.

Use attached file with:
fop -noedit link-bug.fo link-bug.pdf

The link in PDF should point to http://maps.google.com/ but points to some garbage.
When there's no -noedit option everything is fine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37980] - When using FOP with -noedit fo:basic-links get broken

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37980>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37980





------- Additional Comments From ono@java.pl  2005-12-20 17:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=17247)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17247&action=view)
Run this sample with -noedit option

This is buggy behavior example.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37980] - When using FOP with -noedit fo:basic-links get broken

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37980>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37980


jeremias@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From jeremias@apache.org  2005-12-20 19:31 -------
Confirmed. The "uri" string in PDFUri doesn't get encrypted. But wrapping "uri"
in a call to encodeText() won't be enough in this case because PDFUri is used as
a direct object. And for PDF encryption an object and generation number are
needed and these are only available on indirect objects. So, PDFUri would have
to get the parent's info but PDFObject does not currently provide access to the
parent object. Note that there are other potential candidates for the same kind
of processing (PDFGoToRemote, for example). Just an analysis from me this time. :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.