You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2007/02/10 02:44:17 UTC
[VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Going with RC3:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>.
+1
Tested with:
- Windows XP Pro SP2 + current patches
- Sun Java 1.4.2_13
- Ant 1.6.5
- Maven 1.0.2
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 5:44 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
>
> Going with RC3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
>
> The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
Niall
On 2/10/07, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Going with RC3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
>
> The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Going with RC3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
>
> The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Hen
+1 from me
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
[Apologies for spam...]
Jörg Schaible is on the PMC too. I missed his name in the list when scanning.
Hen
On 2/13/07, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vote passed with +1s from:
>
> (PMC)
> Niall Pemberton
> Gary Gregory
> Stephen Colebourne
> Rahul Akolkar
> Simon Kitching (voted on RC1)
>
> (non-PMC)
> Jörg Schaible
>
> Release will go out today.
>
> Hen
>
> On 2/9/07, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Going with RC3:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
> >
> > The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > Hen
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
[RESULT] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Vote passed with +1s from:
(PMC)
Niall Pemberton
Gary Gregory
Stephen Colebourne
Rahul Akolkar
Simon Kitching (voted on RC1)
(non-PMC)
Jörg Schaible
Release will go out today.
Hen
On 2/9/07, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Going with RC3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
>
> The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Hen
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>.
The following worked for me:
- Windows XP Pro SP2 + current patches
- Sun Java 1.6.0, 1.5.0_10 and 1.4.2_13
- Ant 1.6.5
- Maven 1.0.2
- ant clean dist test
- maven clean site:generate
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de]
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 8:50 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
>
> Everything looks good, but I get the test failure below when building
> with both ant and maven.
>
> I am on Windows XP SP2. The problem occurred with JDK 1.5.0_09 and
> 1.6.0. Can anybody reproduce this?
>
> Oliver
>
> Testsuite: org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,18 sec
>
> Testcase:
> testThrowsOnNullList(org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase):
> FAILED
> expected IOException
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected IOException
> at
> org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.testThrowsOnNullList(Fil
> eUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.java:114)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.
> java:25)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.ant.AntTag.doTag(AntTag.java:232)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.invokeBody(TagSupport.java:233)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.IfTag.doTag(IfTag.java:88)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
> at
> org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag.runBodyTag(MavenGoalTag.jav
> a:79)
> at
> org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag$MavenGoalAction.performActi
> on(MavenGoalTag.java:110)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.fire(Goal.java:639)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:575)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
> at com.werken.werkz.WerkzProject.attainGoal(WerkzProject.java:193)
> at
> org.apache.maven.plugin.PluginManager.attainGoals(PluginManager.java:634)
> at org.apache.maven.MavenSession.attainGoals(MavenSession.java:266)
> at org.apache.maven.cli.App.doMain(App.java:486)
> at org.apache.maven.cli.App.main(App.java:1215)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.
> java:25)
> at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.run(Forehead.java:551)
> at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.main(Forehead.java:581)
>
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Going with RC3:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
> >
> > The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Holger Hoffstaette <ho...@wizards.de>.
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:49:39 +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Everything looks good, but I get the test failure below when building with
> both ant and maven.
>
> I am on Windows XP SP2. The problem occurred with JDK 1.5.0_09 and 1.6.0.
> Can anybody reproduce this?
>
> Oliver
>
> Testsuite: org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase Tests
> run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,18 sec
>
> Testcase:
> testThrowsOnNullList(org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase):
> FAILED
> expected IOException
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected IOException
> at
> org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.testThrowsOnNullList(FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.java:114)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at
Works for me with any JDK on Windows. I get a different failure but that's
because I have an expected chmod binary in my Windows %PATH% :-}
-h
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Worth following up for IO 1.4 (could you add it to JIRA?), but as it's
> going to have been in 1.3, I'm not concerned about it being in 1.3.1.
>
> Hen
If nobody else can reproduce this problem, it has probably to do with my
setup. I hope I find some time in the next few days to have a closer
look at the affected test to get an idea what is going on.
Anyway, you can count my vote as a +1.
Oliver
>
> On 2/10/07, Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>
>> Everything looks good, but I get the test failure below when building
>> with both ant and maven.
>>
>> I am on Windows XP SP2. The problem occurred with JDK 1.5.0_09 and
>> 1.6.0. Can anybody reproduce this?
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>> Testsuite: org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase
>> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,18 sec
>>
>> Testcase:
>> testThrowsOnNullList(org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase):
>>
>> FAILED
>> expected IOException
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected IOException
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.testThrowsOnNullList(FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.java:114)
>>
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>
>> at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.ant.AntTag.doTag(AntTag.java:232)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.invokeBody(TagSupport.java:233)
>> at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.IfTag.doTag(IfTag.java:88)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag.runBodyTag(MavenGoalTag.java:79)
>>
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag$MavenGoalAction.performAction(MavenGoalTag.java:110)
>>
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.fire(Goal.java:639)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:575)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
>> at
>> com.werken.werkz.WerkzProject.attainGoal(WerkzProject.java:193)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.plugin.PluginManager.attainGoals(PluginManager.java:634)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.MavenSession.attainGoals(MavenSession.java:266)
>> at org.apache.maven.cli.App.doMain(App.java:486)
>> at org.apache.maven.cli.App.main(App.java:1215)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>
>> at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>
>> at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.run(Forehead.java:551)
>> at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.main(Forehead.java:581)
>>
>>
>> Henri Yandell wrote:
>> > Going with RC3:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
>> >
>> > The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not
>> 1.3.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1
>> > [ ] -1
>> >
>> > Hen
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 2/15/07, Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Oliver Heger wrote:
>>
>> > For the protocol: I think I know now what is going on:
>> >
>> > Some tests in FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase try to delete files that
>> > have been set to read-only. This is expected to throw an exception. To
>> > set the read-only flag the method chmod() tries to execute the unix
>> > "chmod" command. If this fails (which should normally be the case on
>> > windows), the test is ignored.
>> >
>> > Now I am on windows, but I happen to have some unix commands in my path
>> > (these are windows ports of some typical unix commands), including
>> > chmod. So the execution of chmod is successful, but obviously the
>> > command does not have the desired effect: the files can be deleted, and
>> > no exception is thrown. This causes the tests to fail.
>> >
>> > I guess this is a rather unusual scenario.
>>
>> Well, IMHO not *that* unusual. A lot of people use Cygwin (incl. myself),
>> MKS Toolkit, Microsoft's Posix Tools, MingW32 or software that installs
>> such things to run. On a Windows box c-io should not try to run chmod.
>
> Agreed. Could someone add it to JIRA?
Done. IO-115.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On 2/15/07, Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Oliver Heger wrote:
>
> > For the protocol: I think I know now what is going on:
> >
> > Some tests in FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase try to delete files that
> > have been set to read-only. This is expected to throw an exception. To
> > set the read-only flag the method chmod() tries to execute the unix
> > "chmod" command. If this fails (which should normally be the case on
> > windows), the test is ignored.
> >
> > Now I am on windows, but I happen to have some unix commands in my path
> > (these are windows ports of some typical unix commands), including
> > chmod. So the execution of chmod is successful, but obviously the
> > command does not have the desired effect: the files can be deleted, and
> > no exception is thrown. This causes the tests to fail.
> >
> > I guess this is a rather unusual scenario.
>
> Well, IMHO not *that* unusual. A lot of people use Cygwin (incl. myself),
> MKS Toolkit, Microsoft's Posix Tools, MingW32 or software that installs
> such things to run. On a Windows box c-io should not try to run chmod.
Agreed. Could someone add it to JIRA?
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Oliver Heger wrote:
> For the protocol: I think I know now what is going on:
>
> Some tests in FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase try to delete files that
> have been set to read-only. This is expected to throw an exception. To
> set the read-only flag the method chmod() tries to execute the unix
> "chmod" command. If this fails (which should normally be the case on
> windows), the test is ignored.
>
> Now I am on windows, but I happen to have some unix commands in my path
> (these are windows ports of some typical unix commands), including
> chmod. So the execution of chmod is successful, but obviously the
> command does not have the desired effect: the files can be deleted, and
> no exception is thrown. This causes the tests to fail.
>
> I guess this is a rather unusual scenario.
Well, IMHO not *that* unusual. A lot of people use Cygwin (incl. myself),
MKS Toolkit, Microsoft's Posix Tools, MingW32 or software that installs
such things to run. On a Windows box c-io should not try to run chmod.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
For the protocol: I think I know now what is going on:
Some tests in FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase try to delete files that
have been set to read-only. This is expected to throw an exception. To
set the read-only flag the method chmod() tries to execute the unix
"chmod" command. If this fails (which should normally be the case on
windows), the test is ignored.
Now I am on windows, but I happen to have some unix commands in my path
(these are windows ports of some typical unix commands), including
chmod. So the execution of chmod is successful, but obviously the
command does not have the desired effect: the files can be deleted, and
no exception is thrown. This causes the tests to fail.
I guess this is a rather unusual scenario.
Oliver
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Worth following up for IO 1.4 (could you add it to JIRA?), but as it's
> going to have been in 1.3, I'm not concerned about it being in 1.3.1.
>
> Hen
>
> On 2/10/07, Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>> Everything looks good, but I get the test failure below when building
>> with both ant and maven.
>>
>> I am on Windows XP SP2. The problem occurred with JDK 1.5.0_09 and
>> 1.6.0. Can anybody reproduce this?
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>> Testsuite: org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase
>> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,18 sec
>>
>> Testcase:
>> testThrowsOnNullList(org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase):
>>
>> FAILED
>> expected IOException
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected IOException
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.testThrowsOnNullList(FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.java:114)
>>
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>
>> at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.ant.AntTag.doTag(AntTag.java:232)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.invokeBody(TagSupport.java:233)
>> at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.IfTag.doTag(IfTag.java:88)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag.runBodyTag(MavenGoalTag.java:79)
>>
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag$MavenGoalAction.performAction(MavenGoalTag.java:110)
>>
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.fire(Goal.java:639)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:575)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
>> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
>> at
>> com.werken.werkz.WerkzProject.attainGoal(WerkzProject.java:193)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.plugin.PluginManager.attainGoals(PluginManager.java:634)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.MavenSession.attainGoals(MavenSession.java:266)
>> at org.apache.maven.cli.App.doMain(App.java:486)
>> at org.apache.maven.cli.App.main(App.java:1215)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>
>> at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>
>> at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.run(Forehead.java:551)
>> at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.main(Forehead.java:581)
>>
>>
>> Henri Yandell wrote:
>> > Going with RC3:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
>> >
>> > The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not
>> 1.3.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1
>> > [ ] -1
>> >
>> > Hen
>> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Worth following up for IO 1.4 (could you add it to JIRA?), but as it's
going to have been in 1.3, I'm not concerned about it being in 1.3.1.
Hen
On 2/10/07, Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> Everything looks good, but I get the test failure below when building
> with both ant and maven.
>
> I am on Windows XP SP2. The problem occurred with JDK 1.5.0_09 and
> 1.6.0. Can anybody reproduce this?
>
> Oliver
>
> Testsuite: org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,18 sec
>
> Testcase:
> testThrowsOnNullList(org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase):
> FAILED
> expected IOException
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected IOException
> at
> org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.testThrowsOnNullList(FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.java:114)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.ant.AntTag.doTag(AntTag.java:232)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.invokeBody(TagSupport.java:233)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.IfTag.doTag(IfTag.java:88)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
> at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
> at
> org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag.runBodyTag(MavenGoalTag.java:79)
> at
> org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag$MavenGoalAction.performAction(MavenGoalTag.java:110)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.fire(Goal.java:639)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:575)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
> at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
> at com.werken.werkz.WerkzProject.attainGoal(WerkzProject.java:193)
> at
> org.apache.maven.plugin.PluginManager.attainGoals(PluginManager.java:634)
> at org.apache.maven.MavenSession.attainGoals(MavenSession.java:266)
> at org.apache.maven.cli.App.doMain(App.java:486)
> at org.apache.maven.cli.App.main(App.java:1215)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.run(Forehead.java:551)
> at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.main(Forehead.java:581)
>
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Going with RC3:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
> >
> > The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Everything looks good, but I get the test failure below when building
with both ant and maven.
I am on Windows XP SP2. The problem occurred with JDK 1.5.0_09 and
1.6.0. Can anybody reproduce this?
Oliver
Testsuite: org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase
Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,18 sec
Testcase:
testThrowsOnNullList(org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase):
FAILED
expected IOException
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected IOException
at
org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.testThrowsOnNullList(FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.java:114)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.ant.AntTag.doTag(AntTag.java:232)
at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
at org.apache.commons.jelly.TagSupport.invokeBody(TagSupport.java:233)
at org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.core.IfTag.doTag(IfTag.java:88)
at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.TagScript.run(TagScript.java:279)
at org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.ScriptBlock.run(ScriptBlock.java:135)
at
org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag.runBodyTag(MavenGoalTag.java:79)
at
org.apache.maven.jelly.tags.werkz.MavenGoalTag$MavenGoalAction.performAction(MavenGoalTag.java:110)
at com.werken.werkz.Goal.fire(Goal.java:639)
at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:575)
at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attainPrecursors(Goal.java:488)
at com.werken.werkz.Goal.attain(Goal.java:573)
at com.werken.werkz.WerkzProject.attainGoal(WerkzProject.java:193)
at
org.apache.maven.plugin.PluginManager.attainGoals(PluginManager.java:634)
at org.apache.maven.MavenSession.attainGoals(MavenSession.java:266)
at org.apache.maven.cli.App.doMain(App.java:486)
at org.apache.maven.cli.App.main(App.java:1215)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.run(Forehead.java:551)
at com.werken.forehead.Forehead.main(Forehead.java:581)
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Going with RC3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
>
> The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>.
+1
We probably should mark the static changed method as @since 1.3.1, but
that is not a blocker.
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Going with RC3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
>
> The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] IO 1.3.1 (RC3)
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 2/9/07, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Going with RC3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
>
> The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
>
> [X] +1
> [ ] -1
>
<snip/>
Nits:
* Some of the POM cruft might as well be removed (such as cobertura bits)
* POM does not list 1.3 in <versions>
-Rahul
> Hen
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org