You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@openmeetings.apache.org by "Maxim Solodovnik (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/08/14 13:52:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OPENMEETINGS-2417) Video recording locally

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17177783#comment-17177783 ] 

Maxim Solodovnik commented on OPENMEETINGS-2417:
------------------------------------------------

Hello [~jorgelondo],

OM has "star" architecture: all streams goes to server (in case recording is started no additional bandwidth is consumed)

So I see no improvement here :(

Additional disadvantage might be: user device might be limited with CPU/HDD etc. so recording might failed to start or failed to be created


> Video recording locally
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENMEETINGS-2417
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2417
>             Project: Openmeetings
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Recordings
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.0-M4
>            Reporter: Jorge Alberto LondoƱo Giraldo
>            Assignee: Maxim Solodovnik
>            Priority: Major
>
> Hello, I have been testing other platforms and there is one called Learncube, I think it has something that could be applied to openmeetings and that is that the recording is done by the user locally and there is a file in video.web format.
> I say this because I believe that in countries like mine (Colombia) in cities that are not the main ones, the bandwidth is low, therefore making the recording locally frees the bandwidth used for the transmission of the recording to the server. It would also free up a lot of space on the server.
> That platform has a plugin for Google Chrome. This also avoids the problems of recording failure due to small disconnections.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)