You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to qa@openoffice.apache.org by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com> on 2018/04/18 22:22:42 UTC
Many manual test cases now available
Many of the old TestLink test cases are now available (along with others)
from the QA web area --
https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
We could certainly use some feedback on them with respect to:
* usefulness -- what to keep, what to discard
* organization -- can you help with organizing these cases into categories
* clarity -- are the instruction understandable, etc.
More former TestLink cases will be ported soon.
There are other older cases available from this area as well.
Happy testing!
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
Happy to help!
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Mechtilde <oo...@mechtilde.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thats very great!
>
> Thanks for your work
>
> More details later
>
> we should post it also to dev@openoffice.apache.org
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Am 19.04.2018 um 00:22 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> > Many of the old TestLink test cases are now available (along with others)
> > from the QA web area --
> >
> > https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
> >
> > We could certainly use some feedback on them with respect to:
> >
> > * usefulness -- what to keep, what to discard
> > * organization -- can you help with organizing these cases into
> categories
> > * clarity -- are the instruction understandable, etc.
> >
> > More former TestLink cases will be ported soon.
> >
> > There are other older cases available from this area as well.
> >
> > Happy testing!
> >
>
> --
> Mechtilde Stehmann
> ## Apache OpenOffice
> ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
> ## Debian Developer
> ## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
> ## PGP encryption welcome
> ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Parul Sanghi <pa...@gmail.com>.
How to unsubscribe from the mailing list?
thanks
Parul
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Mechtilde <oo...@mechtilde.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thats very great!
>
> Thanks for your work
>
> More details later
>
> we should post it also to dev@openoffice.apache.org
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Am 19.04.2018 um 00:22 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> > Many of the old TestLink test cases are now available (along with others)
> > from the QA web area --
> >
> > https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
> >
> > We could certainly use some feedback on them with respect to:
> >
> > * usefulness -- what to keep, what to discard
> > * organization -- can you help with organizing these cases into
> categories
> > * clarity -- are the instruction understandable, etc.
> >
> > More former TestLink cases will be ported soon.
> >
> > There are other older cases available from this area as well.
> >
> > Happy testing!
> >
>
> --
> Mechtilde Stehmann
> ## Apache OpenOffice
> ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
> ## Debian Developer
> ## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
> ## PGP encryption welcome
> ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
>
>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Mechtilde <oo...@mechtilde.de>.
Hello,
Thats very great!
Thanks for your work
More details later
we should post it also to dev@openoffice.apache.org
Kind regards
Am 19.04.2018 um 00:22 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> Many of the old TestLink test cases are now available (along with others)
> from the QA web area --
>
> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
>
> We could certainly use some feedback on them with respect to:
>
> * usefulness -- what to keep, what to discard
> * organization -- can you help with organizing these cases into categories
> * clarity -- are the instruction understandable, etc.
>
> More former TestLink cases will be ported soon.
>
> There are other older cases available from this area as well.
>
> Happy testing!
>
--
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Apache OpenOffice
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian Developer
## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
## PGP encryption welcome
## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Am 12.06.2018 um 00:32 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> Thanks Matthias. I see we are now back to "Forbidden" . Oh well. Fix coming
> soon.
One thing I do often while using the CMS is to hit the "update" button.
Otherwise what you see not that what you get! ;-)
>
> _______________________
> Sent from MzK's phone.
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 14:23 Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>
> wrote:
>
>> I have now submitted the deletion of the index.html.
>>
>> I don't know why it didn't work for you...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 11.06.2018 um 23:09 schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>> Keith, short update -- see below
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now,
>> things
>>>>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html
>> file
>>>>> needs to be regenerated.
>>>> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my
>>>> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem.
>>>>
>>>> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing
>> them.
>>>> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos
>>>> having difficulty with Windows line endings
>>>>
>>>> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the
>>>> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL
>>>> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can
>>>> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if
>>>> y'all think that might help.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Keith
>>> From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn
>>> update, everything cam through OK.
>>>
>>> On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify
>>> on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the
>>> "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before
>>> I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is
>>> STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden"
>>> message for the whole directory.
>>>
>>> I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures
>>> in the index generation script, in:
>>>
>>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh
>>> in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for
>>> dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be
>>> regenerated whenever changes are made to this area.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>>>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will
>> add
>>>>>>> it to my keyring.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird
>> when
>>>>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation
>> creation
>>>>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> MzK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Less is MORE."
>>>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Matthias. I see we are now back to "Forbidden" . Oh well. Fix coming
soon.
_______________________
Sent from MzK's phone.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 14:23 Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>
wrote:
> I have now submitted the deletion of the index.html.
>
> I don't know why it didn't work for you...
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Am 11.06.2018 um 23:09 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> >
> > On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>> Keith, short update -- see below
> >>>
> >>> <snip>
> >>>
> >>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now,
> things
> >>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html
> file
> >>> needs to be regenerated.
> >> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my
> >> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem.
> >>
> >> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing
> them.
> >> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos
> >> having difficulty with Windows line endings
> >>
> >> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the
> >> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL
> >> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can
> >> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if
> >> y'all think that might help.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Keith
> > From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn
> > update, everything cam through OK.
> >
> > On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify
> > on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the
> > "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before
> > I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is
> > STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden"
> > message for the whole directory.
> >
> > I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures
> > in the index generation script, in:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh
> >
> > in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for
> > dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be
> > regenerated whenever changes are made to this area.
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
> >>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will
> add
> >>>>> it to my keyring.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird
> when
> >>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> Keith
> >>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation
> creation
> >>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
> >>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> MzK
> >>>>
> >>>> "Less is MORE."
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
I have now submitted the deletion of the index.html.
I don't know why it didn't work for you...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 11.06.2018 um 23:09 schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> Keith, short update -- see below
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
>>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file
>>> needs to be regenerated.
>> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my
>> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem.
>>
>> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them.
>> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos
>> having difficulty with Windows line endings
>>
>> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the
>> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL
>> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can
>> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if
>> y'all think that might help.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
> From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn
> update, everything cam through OK.
>
> On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify
> on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the
> "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before
> I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is
> STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden"
> message for the whole directory.
>
> I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures
> in the index generation script, in:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh
>
> in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for
> dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be
> regenerated whenever changes are made to this area.
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>>>>> it to my keyring.
>>>>>
>>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
>>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Keith
>>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> MzK
>>>>
>>>> "Less is MORE."
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mckenna@comcast.net
> wrote:
> Hi again Kay... see below....
>
> On 6/17/2018 5:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > Hi again...see below
> >
> > On 06/12/2018 08:50 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >> On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >>>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>>>> Keith, short update -- see below
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <snip>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> T
> >>>>> hmmm...well the Impress directory itself is NOT showing up on the
> >>>>> staging server, so this IS a problem. You just need to add the
> >>>>> directories themselves to svn and commit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm finding that adding the directories to the index script is not as
> >>>>> simple as I thought it would be, but I am working on it. (grrr! why
> does
> >>>>> stuff work on the command line but not inside a script!) My time is
> >>>>> quite limited for the rest of the week, so maybe in a week or so.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Take care.
> I added and committed the directories. The Impress directory and one
> sub-directory did show up in the staging area. I believe the reason was
> that the sub-directory did have some files in it whereas the other did
> not. However when published it once again get the You don't have
> permission to access /QA/testcase/ManualTesting/ on this server. It is
> however still fine on the staging area.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
Keith --
Looks good now, and thanks again for all your work. I'm hoping I can get
back on the index project over the coming weekend.
Take care.
> >>>>>
> >>> On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did
> verify
> >>> on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the
> >>> "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing,
> before
> >>> I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is
> >>> STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden"
> >>> message for the whole directory.
> >>>
> >>> I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures
> >>> in the index generation script, in:
> >>>
> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/
> scripts/auto-index.sh
> >>>
> >>> in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available
> for
> >>> dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be
> >>> regenerated whenever changes are made to this area.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has
> never
> >>>>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I
> will add
> >>>>>>> it to my keyring.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in
> Thunderbird when
> >>>>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>> Keith
> >>>>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation
> creation
> >>>>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
> >>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >>>>>> MzK
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Less is MORE."
> >>>>>>
> >>
>
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <ke...@comcast.net>.
Hi again Kay... see below....
On 6/17/2018 5:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Hi again...see below
>
> On 06/12/2018 08:50 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>> Keith, short update -- see below
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> T
>>>>> hmmm...well the Impress directory itself is NOT showing up on the
>>>>> staging server, so this IS a problem. You just need to add the
>>>>> directories themselves to svn and commit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm finding that adding the directories to the index script is not as
>>>>> simple as I thought it would be, but I am working on it. (grrr! why does
>>>>> stuff work on the command line but not inside a script!) My time is
>>>>> quite limited for the rest of the week, so maybe in a week or so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take care.
I added and committed the directories. The Impress directory and one
sub-directory did show up in the staging area. I believe the reason was
that the sub-directory did have some files in it whereas the other did
not. However when published it once again get the You don't have
permission to access /QA/testcase/ManualTesting/ on this server. It is
however still fine on the staging area.
Regards
Keith
>>>>>
>>> On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify
>>> on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the
>>> "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before
>>> I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is
>>> STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden"
>>> message for the whole directory.
>>>
>>> I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures
>>> in the index generation script, in:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh
>>>
>>> in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for
>>> dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be
>>> regenerated whenever changes are made to this area.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>>>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>>>>>>> it to my keyring.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
>>>>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>>>>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> MzK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Less is MORE."
>>>>>>
>>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <ke...@comcast.net>.
Response inline
On 6/17/2018 5:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Hi again...see below
>
> On 06/12/2018 08:50 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>> Keith, short update -- see below
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
>>>>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file
>>>>> needs to be regenerated.
>>>> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my
>>>> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem.
>>>>
>>>> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them.
>>>> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos
>>>> having difficulty with Windows line endings
>>>>
>>>> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the
>>>> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL
>>>> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can
>>>> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if
>>>> y'all think that might help.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Keith
>>> From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn
>>> update, everything cam through OK.
>> The only potential downfall is that even after an SVN update they are
>> still showing as unversioned in my working copy. As the initial commit
>> was only to evaluate a more detailed structure it isn't a problem for now.
>>
>> Keith
> hmmm...well the Impress directory itself is NOT showing up on the
> staging server, so this IS a problem. You just need to add the
> directories themselves to svn and commit.
>
> I'm finding that adding the directories to the index script is not as
> simple as I thought it would be, but I am working on it. (grrr! why does
> stuff work on the command line but not inside a script!) My time is
> quite limited for the rest of the week, so maybe in a week or so.
>
> Take care.
> Kay;
Just got home from a motorcycle ride to my better half's. Will do the
add and re-commit after I do dishes.
Take Care
Keith
>>> On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify
>>> on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the
>>> "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before
>>> I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is
>>> STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden"
>>> message for the whole directory.
>>>
>>> I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures
>>> in the index generation script, in:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh
>>>
>>> in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for
>>> dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be
>>> regenerated whenever changes are made to this area.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>>>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>>>>>>> it to my keyring.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
>>>>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>>>>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> MzK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Less is MORE."
>>>>>>
>>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi again...see below
On 06/12/2018 08:50 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> Keith, short update -- see below
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
>>>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file
>>>> needs to be regenerated.
>>> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my
>>> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem.
>>>
>>> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them.
>>> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos
>>> having difficulty with Windows line endings
>>>
>>> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the
>>> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL
>>> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can
>>> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if
>>> y'all think that might help.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Keith
>> From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn
>> update, everything cam through OK.
> The only potential downfall is that even after an SVN update they are
> still showing as unversioned in my working copy. As the initial commit
> was only to evaluate a more detailed structure it isn't a problem for now.
>
> Keith
hmmm...well the Impress directory itself is NOT showing up on the
staging server, so this IS a problem. You just need to add the
directories themselves to svn and commit.
I'm finding that adding the directories to the index script is not as
simple as I thought it would be, but I am working on it. (grrr! why does
stuff work on the command line but not inside a script!) My time is
quite limited for the rest of the week, so maybe in a week or so.
Take care.
>>
>> On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify
>> on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the
>> "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before
>> I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is
>> STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden"
>> message for the whole directory.
>>
>> I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures
>> in the index generation script, in:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh
>>
>> in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for
>> dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be
>> regenerated whenever changes are made to this area.
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>>>>>> it to my keyring.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
>>>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>>>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> MzK
>>>>>
>>>>> "Less is MORE."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <ke...@comcast.net>.
On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> Keith, short update -- see below
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
>>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file
>>> needs to be regenerated.
>> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my
>> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem.
>>
>> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them.
>> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos
>> having difficulty with Windows line endings
>>
>> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the
>> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL
>> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can
>> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if
>> y'all think that might help.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
> From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn
> update, everything cam through OK.
The only potential downfall is that even after an SVN update they are
still showing as unversioned in my working copy. As the initial commit
was only to evaluate a more detailed structure it isn't a problem for now.
Keith
>
> On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify
> on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the
> "default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before
> I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is
> STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden"
> message for the whole directory.
>
> I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures
> in the index generation script, in:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh
>
> in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for
> dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be
> regenerated whenever changes are made to this area.
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>>>>> it to my keyring.
>>>>>
>>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
>>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Keith
>>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> MzK
>>>>
>>>> "Less is MORE."
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>
> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Keith, short update -- see below
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
>> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file
>> needs to be regenerated.
> On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my
> unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem.
>
> 1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them.
> 2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos
> having difficulty with Windows line endings
>
> If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the
> directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL
> property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can
> also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if
> y'all think that might help.
>
> Regards
> Keith
From what I can see right now, #1 is not a problem. When I did an svn
update, everything cam through OK.
On the other (my) issue about index.html NOT being removed. I did verify
on staging that the index.html had been removed reverting to the
"default" setup on that server of just displaying a file listing, before
I did the publish. In any case, maybe just as well the index.html is
STILL there in production otherwise we may have gotten teh "forbidden"
message for the whole directory.
I should have time to make changes to accommodate directory structures
in the index generation script, in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/scripts/auto-index.sh
in the next day or so. Since we have no dynamic mechanisms available for
dynamic server-side page generation, the index will need to be
regenerated whenever changes are made to this area.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>>>> it to my keyring.
>>>>
>>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
>>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Keith
>>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> MzK
>>>
>>> "Less is MORE."
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <ke...@comcast.net>.
On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Keith, short update -- see below
>
> <snip>
>
> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file
> needs to be regenerated.
On further study there may be a couple of mistakes on my part due to my
unfamiliarity with SVN that may have contributed to this problem.
1. I did not do a specific add of the directories before committing them.
2. I use Tortoise SVN and I vaguely remember something about the repos
having difficulty with Windows line endings
If either of these could be contributing I can do the add for the
directories and try the commit again. Also Tortoise SVN now has an EOL
property that also to specifically set the EOL type to be used. I can
also try setting those directories to specifically use Linux EOL's if
y'all think that might help.
Regards
Keith
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>>> it to my keyring.
>>>
>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards
>>> Keith
>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> MzK
>>
>> "Less is MORE."
>>
>
>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Kay,
The deletion of the index.html is not published:
https://cms.apache.org/ooo-site/publish?diff=1
Regards,
Matthias
Am 09.06.2018 um 19:20 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> Keith, short update -- see below
>
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
>> keith.mckenna@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
>>> keith.mckenna@comcast.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application
>>>>>>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want
>>> to use
>>>>>>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained
>>>>>>> units
>>>>>>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc,
>>> etc.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> sounds ideal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
>>>>>>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
>>>>>>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit
>>> them
>>>>>>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would
>>> either
>>>>>>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you
>>> are
>>>>>>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory
>>> structure on
>>>>>>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
>>>>>>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have
>>> done
>>>>>>>> this as well. :(
>>>>>>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my
>>> current
>>>>>>>> personal schedule.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
>>>>>>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look?
>>>>>>> Kay;
>>>>>>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure
>>> was
>>>>>>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of
>>>>>>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different
>>>>>>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at
>>> all.
>>>>>> The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed
>>> mostly to
>>>>>> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the
>>> time
>>>>>> which is why
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on
>>>>>> TestLInk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy
>>>>>>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds good!
>>>>> Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to
>>> the
>>>>> ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the
>>>>> production website. Is there something else I should have changed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend
>>> and
>>>>> some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Keith
>>>> Hi Keith --
>>>> No worries. I'll take a look. Did you "publish" your changes after
>>>> committing?
>>> No was not aware of that step or how to do it. I rarely use my committer
>>> privileges as I am not a coder in any way shape or form. I used to use
>>> the cms to make minor changes to the aoo site but that no longer appears
>>> to work. If you do not mind giving me a quick rundown on how I will be
>>> glad to do that in the future.
>>>
>>
>> Typically, the sequence of events for changes to the web server is to:
>> * commit your changes,
>> * review on the staging server (ooo-site staging
>> <http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/>),
>> * then publish to the production server if all is well.
>>
>> I use the "Easy Publish" facility from https://cms.apache.org/.
>> Once you supply your ASF credentials, navigate to ooo-site, and just click
>> "Publish ooo-site".
>>
>> For now, I deleted the old index.html. I will need to modify the script to
>> accommodate directory structures rather just a list of files. So, hopefully
>> by mid-week, we will have the Impress items "show up". Thank you again for
>> all your work.
>>
> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file
> needs to be regenerated.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>>> it to my keyring.
>>>
>> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards
>>> Keith
>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> MzK
>>
>> "Less is MORE."
>>
>
>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
Keith, short update -- see below
On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
> keith.mckenna@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> > On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> >> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> >>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
>> keith.mckenna@comcast.net>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> >>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> >>>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> <snip>
>> >>>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application
>> >>>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want
>> to use
>> >>>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained
>> >>>> units
>> >>>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>>>> Keith
>> >>>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc,
>> etc.
>> >>>> --
>> >>>>>>> sounds ideal.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
>> >>>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
>> >>>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit
>> them
>> >>>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would
>> either
>> >>>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you
>> are
>> >>>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory
>> structure on
>> >>>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
>> >>>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have
>> done
>> >>>>> this as well. :(
>> >>>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my
>> current
>> >>>>> personal schedule.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
>> >>>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look?
>> >>>> Kay;
>> >>>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure
>> was
>> >>>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of
>> >>>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different
>> >>>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at
>> all.
>> >>>>
>> >>> The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed
>> mostly to
>> >>> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the
>> time
>> >>> which is why
>> >>>
>> >>> I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on
>> >>> TestLInk.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy
>> >>>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week.
>> >>>>
>> >>> Sounds good!
>> >> Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to
>> the
>> >> ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the
>> >> production website. Is there something else I should have changed?
>> >>
>> >> Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend
>> and
>> >> some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Keith
>> > Hi Keith --
>> > No worries. I'll take a look. Did you "publish" your changes after
>> > committing?
>> No was not aware of that step or how to do it. I rarely use my committer
>> privileges as I am not a coder in any way shape or form. I used to use
>> the cms to make minor changes to the aoo site but that no longer appears
>> to work. If you do not mind giving me a quick rundown on how I will be
>> glad to do that in the future.
>>
>
>
> Typically, the sequence of events for changes to the web server is to:
> * commit your changes,
> * review on the staging server (ooo-site staging
> <http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/>),
> * then publish to the production server if all is well.
>
> I use the "Easy Publish" facility from https://cms.apache.org/.
> Once you supply your ASF credentials, navigate to ooo-site, and just click
> "Publish ooo-site".
>
> For now, I deleted the old index.html. I will need to modify the script to
> accommodate directory structures rather just a list of files. So, hopefully
> by mid-week, we will have the Impress items "show up". Thank you again for
> all your work.
>
This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file
needs to be regenerated.
>
>
>>
>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>> it to my keyring.
>>
>
> Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
>> > If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>> > script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>> > Thanks so much for your work on this,
>> >
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> MzK
>
> "Less is MORE."
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mckenna@comcast.net
> wrote:
> On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
> keith.mckenna@comcast.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >>>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>>>>>>> <snip>
> >>>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application
> >>>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to
> use
> >>>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained
> >>>> units
> >>>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>> Keith
> >>>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc,
> etc.
> >>>> --
> >>>>>>> sounds ideal.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
> >>>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
> >>>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them
> >>>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would
> either
> >>>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you
> are
> >>>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory
> structure on
> >>>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
> >>>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have
> done
> >>>>> this as well. :(
> >>>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current
> >>>>> personal schedule.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
> >>>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look?
> >>>> Kay;
> >>>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was
> >>>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of
> >>>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different
> >>>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at
> all.
> >>>>
> >>> The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed
> mostly to
> >>> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the
> time
> >>> which is why
> >>>
> >>> I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on
> >>> TestLInk.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy
> >>>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week.
> >>>>
> >>> Sounds good!
> >> Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to the
> >> ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the
> >> production website. Is there something else I should have changed?
> >>
> >> Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend and
> >> some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Keith
> > Hi Keith --
> > No worries. I'll take a look. Did you "publish" your changes after
> > committing?
> No was not aware of that step or how to do it. I rarely use my committer
> privileges as I am not a coder in any way shape or form. I used to use
> the cms to make minor changes to the aoo site but that no longer appears
> to work. If you do not mind giving me a quick rundown on how I will be
> glad to do that in the future.
>
Typically, the sequence of events for changes to the web server is to:
* commit your changes,
* review on the staging server (ooo-site staging
<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/>),
* then publish to the production server if all is well.
I use the "Easy Publish" facility from https://cms.apache.org/.
Once you supply your ASF credentials, navigate to ooo-site, and just click
"Publish ooo-site".
For now, I deleted the old index.html. I will need to modify the script to
accommodate directory structures rather just a list of files. So, hopefully
by mid-week, we will have the Impress items "show up". Thank you again for
all your work.
>
> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
> it to my keyring.
>
Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>
> Regards
> Keith
> > If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
> > script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
> > Thanks so much for your work on this,
> >
> >>
>
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <ke...@comcast.net>.
On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <ke...@comcast.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application
>>>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use
>>>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained
>>>> units
>>>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc.
>>>> --
>>>>>>> sounds ideal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
>>>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
>>>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them
>>>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either
>>>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are
>>>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on
>>>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
>>>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done
>>>>> this as well. :(
>>>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current
>>>>> personal schedule.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
>>>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
>>>>>
>>>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look?
>>>> Kay;
>>>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was
>>>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of
>>>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different
>>>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at all.
>>>>
>>> The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed mostly to
>>> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the time
>>> which is why
>>>
>>> I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on
>>> TestLInk.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy
>>>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week.
>>>>
>>> Sounds good!
>> Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to the
>> ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the
>> production website. Is there something else I should have changed?
>>
>> Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend and
>> some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
> Hi Keith --
> No worries. I'll take a look. Did you "publish" your changes after
> committing?
No was not aware of that step or how to do it. I rarely use my committer
privileges as I am not a coder in any way shape or form. I used to use
the cms to make minor changes to the aoo site but that no longer appears
to work. If you do not mind giving me a quick rundown on how I will be
glad to do that in the future.
BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
it to my keyring.
Regards
Keith
> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>
>>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <ke...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application
>>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use
>>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained
>>> units
>>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc.
>>> --
>>>>>> sounds ideal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
>>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
>>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them
>>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either
>>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are
>>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on
>>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
>>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done
>>>> this as well. :(
>>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current
>>>> personal schedule.
>>>>
>>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
>>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
>>>>
>>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look?
>>> Kay;
>>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was
>>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of
>>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different
>>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at all.
>>>
>> The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed mostly to
>> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the time
>> which is why
>>
>> I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on
>> TestLInk.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy
>>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week.
>>>
>> Sounds good!
> Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to the
> ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the
> production website. Is there something else I should have changed?
>
> Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend and
> some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic.
>
> Regards
> Keith
Hi Keith --
No worries. I'll take a look. Did you "publish" your changes after
committing?
If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
Thanks so much for your work on this,
>
>
--
------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <ke...@comcast.net>.
On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <ke...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application
>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use
>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained
>> units
>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Keith
>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc.
>> --
>>>>> sounds ideal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them
>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either
>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are
>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on
>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done
>>> this as well. :(
>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current
>>> personal schedule.
>>>
>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
>>>
>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look?
>> Kay;
>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was
>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of
>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different
>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at all.
>>
>
> The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed mostly to
> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the time
> which is why
>
> I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on
> TestLInk.
>
>
>
>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy
>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week.
>>
> Sounds good!
Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to the
ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the
production website. Is there something else I should have changed?
Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend and
some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic.
Regards
Keith
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <ke...@comcast.net>
wrote:
> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>>> <snip>
> >> I think the first level of organization should be by application
> >>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use
> >>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained
> units
> >>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Keith
> >>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc.
> --
> >>> sounds ideal.
> >>>
> >>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
> >> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
> >> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them
> >> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either
> >> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are
> >> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on
> >> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
> > That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done
> > this as well. :(
> > I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current
> > personal schedule.
> >
> > Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
> > https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
> >
> > and just use your structure so we can take a look?
> Kay;
> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was
> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of
> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different
> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at all.
>
The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed mostly to
be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the time
which is why
I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on
TestLInk.
>
> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy
> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week.
>
Sounds good!
>
> Regards
> Keith
> >
> >> I believe that a deeper level of granularity is needed that just the
> >> application.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Keith
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <ke...@comcast.net>.
On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>> I think the first level of organization should be by application
>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use
>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained units
>>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Keith
>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc. --
>>> sounds ideal.
>>>
>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them
>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either
>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are
>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on
>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done
> this as well. :(
> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current
> personal schedule.
>
> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
>
> and just use your structure so we can take a look?
Kay;
I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was
somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of
the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different
type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at all.
I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy
with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week.
Regards
Keith
>
>> I believe that a deeper level of granularity is needed that just the
>> application.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
>> <snip>
>>
>>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> <snip>
> I think the first level of organization should be by application
>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use
>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained units
>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Keith
>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc. --
>> sounds ideal.
>>
>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them
> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either
> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are
> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on
> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done
this as well. :(
I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current
personal schedule.
Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
and just use your structure so we can take a look?
>
> I believe that a deeper level of granularity is needed that just the
> application.
>
> Regards
> Keith
> <snip>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <ke...@comcast.net>.
On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> <snip>
I think the first level of organization should be by application
>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use
>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained units
>> that people could volunteer to execute.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith
> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc. --
> sounds ideal.
>
> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them
into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either
have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are
can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on
the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
I believe that a deeper level of granularity is needed that just the
application.
Regards
Keith
<snip>
Re: Many manual test cases now available
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Many of the old TestLink test cases are now available (along with others)
>> from the QA web area --
>>
>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
>>
>> We could certainly use some feedback on them with respect to:
>>
>> * usefulness -- what to keep, what to discard
>> * organization -- can you help with organizing these cases into categories
> I think the first level of organization should be by application
> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use
> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained units
> that people could volunteer to execute.
>
> Regards
> Keith
Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc. --
sounds ideal.
Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
>> * clarity -- are the instruction understandable, etc.
>>
>> More former TestLink cases will be ported soon.
>>
>> There are other older cases available from this area as well.
>>
>> Happy testing!
>>
>
--
------------------------------------------
MzK
"Less is MORE."
Many manual test cases now available
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <ke...@comcast.net>.
On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Many of the old TestLink test cases are now available (along with others)
> from the QA web area --
>
> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
>
> We could certainly use some feedback on them with respect to:
>
> * usefulness -- what to keep, what to discard
> * organization -- can you help with organizing these cases into categories
I think the first level of organization should be by application
(Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use
them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained units
that people could volunteer to execute.
Regards
Keith
> * clarity -- are the instruction understandable, etc.
>
> More former TestLink cases will be ported soon.
>
> There are other older cases available from this area as well.
>
> Happy testing!
>