Traffic Control SLA

["Eric Friedrich (efriedri)" <ef...@cisco.com>]

Hi All-
  We had some discussion around what level of support we want to offer to users of our software. 


  I'd like to suggest a policy that for all releases we will fix all security issues and we will fix regressions at discretion of the release manager. 

  There was also discussion about how long we should support a release for. 

  Options included:
  - Doing only 1-2 LTS releases per year 
  - Having many smaller point releases with 1 or 2 LTS releases per year. 

  We should also define the support timeline of an LTS release to say supporting the two most recent LTS at all times. 

  Thoughts?

Re: Traffic Control SLA

[Dave Neuman <ne...@apache.org>]

I feel like we aren't mature enough yet to formalize this.  We only have 1
official "release" under our belt and we are working towards our second.  I
think the best solution for now would be to try to define this as we go and
handle security, regressions, etc with discussions.
Of course, I can be convinced otherwise.


On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
efriedri@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi All-
>   We had some discussion around what level of support we want to offer to
> users of our software.
>
>
>   I'd like to suggest a policy that for all releases we will fix all
> security issues and we will fix regressions at discretion of the release
> manager.
>
>   There was also discussion about how long we should support a release for.
>
>   Options included:
>   - Doing only 1-2 LTS releases per year
>   - Having many smaller point releases with 1 or 2 LTS releases per year.
>
>   We should also define the support timeline of an LTS release to say
> supporting the two most recent LTS at all times.
>
>   Thoughts?
>
>