Re: 'annotate -g' confused about source of some merged changes

[Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.co.il>]

McHenry, Matt wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 at 16:00 -0400:
> $ svn annotate -g foo-msg.txt 
> G      5   mmchenry b1
> G      8   mmchenry b3
> G     12   mmchenry b5
>        2   mmchenry b6
> 
...
> #the file was added, and it was empty at that point, so it couldn't be
> the source of the 4th line:
> $ svn cat -r 2 foo-msg.txt | wc
>        0       0       0
> 

Yes, this looks like a bug.  Could you please file an issue (if there
isn't one already) so we don't forget it?

Thanks,

Daniel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org