You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Ilya Lantukh (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/09/06 15:49:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (IGNITE-9419) Avoid saving cache
configuration synchronously during PME
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16605879#comment-16605879 ]
Ilya Lantukh edited comment on IGNITE-9419 at 9/6/18 3:48 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
[~Jokser],
Thanks for contribution!
In my opinion, adding public-mutable GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.registerCachesFuture breaks encapsulation. Is it possible to re-design your solution to make this field modifiable only by ExchangeFuture itself?
Also, please add tests for this functionality.
was (Author: ilantukh):
[~Jokser],
Thanks for contribution!
In my opinion, adding publicly-mutable GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.registerCachesFuture breaks encapsulation. Is it possible to re-design your solution to make this field modifiable only by ExchangeFuture itself?
Also, please add tests for this functionality.
> Avoid saving cache configuration synchronously during PME
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-9419
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9419
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: cache
> Affects Versions: 2.5
> Reporter: Pavel Kovalenko
> Assignee: Pavel Kovalenko
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7
>
>
> Currently, we save cache configuration during PME at the activation phase here org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheAffinitySharedManager.CachesInfo#updateCachesInfo . We should avoid this, as it performs operations to a disk. We should save it asynchronously or lazy.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)