[superset] branch master updated: fix misspelling (#18097)

[aa...@apache.org]

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

aafghahi pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/superset.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new f505094  fix misspelling (#18097)
f505094 is described below

commit f505094835d43365696144eb8bf8f9a1d5977994
Author: Emily Wu <86...@users.noreply.github.com>
AuthorDate: Wed Jan 19 15:56:52 2022 -0500

    fix misspelling (#18097)
---
 CONTRIBUTING.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md
index 5ed0a10..37105b8 100644
--- a/CONTRIBUTING.md
+++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ In the event a community member discovers a security flaw in Superset, it is imp
 
 Reverting changes that are causing issues in the master branch is a normal and expected part of the development process. In an open source community, the ramifications of a change cannot always be fully understood. With that in mind, here are some considerations to keep in mind when considering a revert:
 
-- **Availability of the PR author:** If the original PR author or the engineer who merged the code is highly available and can provide a fix in a reasonable timeframe, this would counter-indicate reverting.
+- **Availability of the PR author:** If the original PR author or the engineer who merged the code is highly available and can provide a fix in a reasonable time frame, this would counter-indicate reverting.
 - **Severity of the issue:** How severe is the problem on master? Is it keeping the project from moving forward? Is there user impact? What percentage of users will experience a problem?
 - **Size of the change being reverted:** Reverting a single small PR is a much lower-risk proposition than reverting a massive, multi-PR change.
 - **Age of the change being reverted:** Reverting a recently-merged PR will be more acceptable than reverting an older PR. A bug discovered in an older PR is unlikely to be causing widespread serious issues.