You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Luca Burgazzoli (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/03/09 09:14:38 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-10969) JSonSchemaHelper - Json parser
should we use json-simple instead
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15902732#comment-15902732 ]
Luca Burgazzoli commented on CAMEL-10969:
-----------------------------------------
There is also https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-jr which among other things supports:
- Object binding (https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-jr#readingwriting-simple-objects-beans-listarrays-thereof)
- Fluent builder to generate JSon (https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-jr#writing-with-composers)
> JSonSchemaHelper - Json parser should we use json-simple instead
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-10969
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10969
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> We use our own json parser in JSonSchemaHelper in different places as part of the catalog stuff we have done over the last 3-4 years. And as it has expanded to be used in more places than just as in the beginning in apt, we are duplicating some of that code around.
> We could consider shading in json-simple in camel-core and camel-catalog.
> And where its used in apt, maven plugins and elsewhere.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)