You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@devicemap.apache.org by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> on 2015/08/13 10:19:59 UTC
Making sure, all released parts are visible
All,
The download page
http://devicemap.apache.org/download/
shows only part of what's already been released.
Beside simply echoing every word Reza said, unlike Reza himself Eberhard
never even released any files aside from tagging sources "1.0.0-incubating"
once.
I fixed some bugs, so doing a 1.0.1 release of both sounds reasonable and
releasing them properly this time.
BrowserMap still says 1.4.1-incubating. That's correct for its last
release. Radu do you expect another release in the near future, as this is
your technical focus beside helping the overall project as PMC chair?
Cheers,
Werner
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Yep, when Radu last released Browsermap he put the archives under
Staging URL: https://people.apache.org/~radu/browsermap/
So I'll follow a similar procedure for .NET as it does not involve the
Maven part either.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Will have a look. For .NET deliverables it was never done, and at least
> the Maven part (also communicated on the Tamaya list I am on) is not
> applicable as for Java.
>
> Guess Browsermap would be since that was delivered to the right folders;-)
>
> Werner
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > ...Where would be the best place for binaries as Release Candidate
>> (before
>> > voting)? http://people.apache.org/builds/ or under our VM?...
>>
>> You can check this list's archive to see how the previous releases were
>> done.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>
>
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Will have a look. For .NET deliverables it was never done, and at least the
Maven part (also communicated on the Tamaya list I am on) is not applicable
as for Java.
Guess Browsermap would be since that was delivered to the right folders;-)
Werner
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org
> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > ...Where would be the best place for binaries as Release Candidate
> (before
> > voting)? http://people.apache.org/builds/ or under our VM?...
>
> You can check this list's archive to see how the previous releases were
> done.
>
> -Bertrand
>
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...Where would be the best place for binaries as Release Candidate (before
> voting)? http://people.apache.org/builds/ or under our VM?...
You can check this list's archive to see how the previous releases were done.
-Bertrand
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Seems, VS Code is only for editing sources, but does not include runtime
compilers other than for Node.js or ASP.net. So for Rich Client or Console
apps VS 2015 CE looks like the way to go.
I checked folders under
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#build-directories
And the /dist folder of DeviceMap also has no sign of the .NET clients.
Where would be the best place for binaries as Release Candidate (before
voting)? http://people.apache.org/builds/ or under our VM?
I haven't tried to upload there yet, but guess committer accounds should
work in most cases for those places.
Cheers,
Werner
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Even in often small teams/EGs, JCP.next taught us a discipline regarding
> times to release, making it more "Agile" if you want, so I try to apply it
> in other OS projects, too where I can;-)
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I will, bare it me for a while (in JIRA I estimated end of Aug, could be
>> sooner if all goes well)
>>
>> Werner
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Radu Cotescu <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Cool! Can you then please take care of this release? My experience with
>>> .NET is exactly 0 and I don't have a Windows machine around to run the
>>> tests in order to make sure that everything works as expected.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Radu
>>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 13:35 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > for .NET there were, mostly fixing bugs (e.g.
>>> > not finding any device data) but there I'd say it justifies a 1.0.1
>>> release
>>> > at least.
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Even in often small teams/EGs, JCP.next taught us a discipline regarding
times to release, making it more "Agile" if you want, so I try to apply it
in other OS projects, too where I can;-)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will, bare it me for a while (in JIRA I estimated end of Aug, could be
> sooner if all goes well)
>
> Werner
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Radu Cotescu <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Cool! Can you then please take care of this release? My experience with
>> .NET is exactly 0 and I don't have a Windows machine around to run the
>> tests in order to make sure that everything works as expected.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Radu
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 13:35 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > for .NET there were, mostly fixing bugs (e.g.
>> > not finding any device data) but there I'd say it justifies a 1.0.1
>> release
>> > at least.
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
I will, bare it me for a while (in JIRA I estimated end of Aug, could be
sooner if all goes well)
Werner
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Radu Cotescu <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
> Cool! Can you then please take care of this release? My experience with
> .NET is exactly 0 and I don't have a Windows machine around to run the
> tests in order to make sure that everything works as expected.
>
> Thanks,
> Radu
>
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 13:35 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > for .NET there were, mostly fixing bugs (e.g.
> > not finding any device data) but there I'd say it justifies a 1.0.1
> release
> > at least.
> >
>
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Radu Cotescu <ra...@apache.org>.
Cool! Can you then please take care of this release? My experience with
.NET is exactly 0 and I don't have a Windows machine around to run the
tests in order to make sure that everything works as expected.
Thanks,
Radu
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 13:35 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> for .NET there were, mostly fixing bugs (e.g.
> not finding any device data) but there I'd say it justifies a 1.0.1 release
> at least.
>
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Can't say for BrowserMap, but for .NET there were, mostly fixing bugs (e.g.
not finding any device data) but there I'd say it justifies a 1.0.1 release
at least.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Radu Cotescu <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
> > ...For BrowserMap we haven't had any code changes since DeviceMap
> graduated
> > and became a TLP, so I'm not sure if 1.4.2 would make sense, just to drop
> > 'incubator' from the artifact name. WDYT?...
>
> I don't think releasing is useful if there are no code changes.
>
> -Bertrand
>
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Radu Cotescu <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
> ...For BrowserMap we haven't had any code changes since DeviceMap graduated
> and became a TLP, so I'm not sure if 1.4.2 would make sense, just to drop
> 'incubator' from the artifact name. WDYT?...
I don't think releasing is useful if there are no code changes.
-Bertrand
Re: Making sure, all released parts are visible
Posted by Radu Cotescu <ra...@apache.org>.
Hi Werner,
Could you handle the release for the .NET module? You'd have to create the
release artifacts (which should only contain source code), stage them, and
then start the release thread for that module. Obviously the 3 members of
the PMC (Bertrand, you and I) have to vote on it.
For BrowserMap we haven't had any code changes since DeviceMap graduated
and became a TLP, so I'm not sure if 1.4.2 would make sense, just to drop
'incubator' from the artifact name. WDYT?
Cheers,
Radu
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 10:27 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> The download page
> http://devicemap.apache.org/download/
> shows only part of what's already been released.
>
> Beside simply echoing every word Reza said, unlike Reza himself Eberhard
> never even released any files aside from tagging sources "1.0.0-incubating"
> once.
>
> I fixed some bugs, so doing a 1.0.1 release of both sounds reasonable and
> releasing them properly this time.
>
> BrowserMap still says 1.4.1-incubating. That's correct for its last
> release. Radu do you expect another release in the near future, as this is
> your technical focus beside helping the overall project as PMC chair?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Werner
>