You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tapestry.apache.org by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/12/31 23:58:29 UTC
[jira] Created: (TAP5-966) TapestryFilter should support a test
mode (from a JVM system proprerty) and an init parameter to specify
additional module classes when in test mode
TapestryFilter should support a test mode (from a JVM system proprerty) and an init parameter to specify additional module classes when in test mode
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TAP5-966
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-966
Project: Tapestry 5
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: tapestry-core
Affects Versions: 5.2.0
Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
Priority: Minor
Frequently when integration testing an application, it is desirable to re-configure some parts of it (i.e., special symbol defaults, new service overrides, special service configurations), which currently is ad-hoc or otherwise awkward.
If the T5 filter included an init-param "tapestry.test-modules" as a comma-separated list of module classes to load (in addition to the default) that would be great.
Possibly this could be generalized to a "run-mode" that could be "test" or "integration" (or any arbitrary string) and Tapestry would include "tapestry.xyz-modules" if it exists as an init param. The default would be "production" which would allow for some large scale swapping out of production modules vs. test modules.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (TAP5-966) TapestryFilter should be able add
additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or
other) execution configurations
Posted by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Howard M. Lewis Ship updated TAP5-966:
--------------------------------------
Description:
Frequently when integration testing an application, it is desirable to re-configure some parts of it (i.e., special symbol defaults, new service overrides, special service configurations), which currently is ad-hoc or otherwise awkward.
How about if there was a special JVM system property: tapestry.execution-mode. This would be a comma-seperated list of mode names. For each one, the T5 filter would check for a <init-parameter> named "tapestry.foo-modules" (where "foo" is a mode name) and add those to the Registry. The default value for execution-mode would be "production" ... thus you could easily have certain module classes loaded for normal production and a different set loaded for integration testing.
was:
Frequently when integration testing an application, it is desirable to re-configure some parts of it (i.e., special symbol defaults, new service overrides, special service configurations), which currently is ad-hoc or otherwise awkward.
If the T5 filter included an init-param "tapestry.test-modules" as a comma-separated list of module classes to load (in addition to the default) that would be great.
Possibly this could be generalized to a "run-mode" that could be "test" or "integration" (or any arbitrary string) and Tapestry would include "tapestry.xyz-modules" if it exists as an init param. The default would be "production" which would allow for some large scale swapping out of production modules vs. test modules.
Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
Summary: TapestryFilter should be able add additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or other) execution configurations (was: TapestryFilter should support a test mode (from a JVM system proprerty) and an init parameter to specify additional module classes when in test mode)
> TapestryFilter should be able add additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or other) execution configurations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-966
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-966
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: tapestry-core
> Affects Versions: 5.2.0
> Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Priority: Minor
>
> Frequently when integration testing an application, it is desirable to re-configure some parts of it (i.e., special symbol defaults, new service overrides, special service configurations), which currently is ad-hoc or otherwise awkward.
> How about if there was a special JVM system property: tapestry.execution-mode. This would be a comma-seperated list of mode names. For each one, the T5 filter would check for a <init-parameter> named "tapestry.foo-modules" (where "foo" is a mode name) and add those to the Registry. The default value for execution-mode would be "production" ... thus you could easily have certain module classes loaded for normal production and a different set loaded for integration testing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (TAP5-966) TapestryFilter should be able add
additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or
other) execution configurations
Posted by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Howard M. Lewis Ship updated TAP5-966:
--------------------------------------
Description:
Frequently when integration testing an application, it is desirable to re-configure some parts of it (i.e., special symbol defaults, new service overrides, special service configurations), which currently is ad-hoc or otherwise awkward.
How about if there was a special JVM system property: tapestry.execution-mode. This would be a comma-seperated list of mode names. For each one, the T5 filter would check for a <init-parameter> named "tapestry.foo-modules" (where "foo" is a mode name) and add those to the Registry. The default value for execution-mode would be "production" ... thus you could easily have certain module classes loaded for normal production and a different set loaded for integration testing.
was:
Frequently when integration testing an application, it is desirable to re-configure some parts of it (i.e., special symbol defaults, new service overrides, special service configurations), which currently is ad-hoc or otherwise awkward.
If the T5 filter included an init-param "tapestry.test-modules" as a comma-separated list of module classes to load (in addition to the default) that would be great.
Possibly this could be generalized to a "run-mode" that could be "test" or "integration" (or any arbitrary string) and Tapestry would include "tapestry.xyz-modules" if it exists as an init param. The default would be "production" which would allow for some large scale swapping out of production modules vs. test modules.
Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
Summary: TapestryFilter should be able add additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or other) execution configurations (was: TapestryFilter should support a test mode (from a JVM system proprerty) and an init parameter to specify additional module classes when in test mode)
> TapestryFilter should be able add additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or other) execution configurations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-966
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-966
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: tapestry-core
> Affects Versions: 5.2.0
> Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Priority: Minor
>
> Frequently when integration testing an application, it is desirable to re-configure some parts of it (i.e., special symbol defaults, new service overrides, special service configurations), which currently is ad-hoc or otherwise awkward.
> How about if there was a special JVM system property: tapestry.execution-mode. This would be a comma-seperated list of mode names. For each one, the T5 filter would check for a <init-parameter> named "tapestry.foo-modules" (where "foo" is a mode name) and add those to the Registry. The default value for execution-mode would be "production" ... thus you could easily have certain module classes loaded for normal production and a different set loaded for integration testing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (TAP5-966) TapestryFilter should be able add
additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or
other) execution configurations
Posted by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Howard M. Lewis Ship closed TAP5-966.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.2.0
> TapestryFilter should be able add additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or other) execution configurations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-966
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-966
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: tapestry-core
> Affects Versions: 5.2.0
> Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
>
> Frequently when integration testing an application, it is desirable to re-configure some parts of it (i.e., special symbol defaults, new service overrides, special service configurations), which currently is ad-hoc or otherwise awkward.
> How about if there was a special JVM system property: tapestry.execution-mode. This would be a comma-seperated list of mode names. For each one, the T5 filter would check for a <init-parameter> named "tapestry.foo-modules" (where "foo" is a mode name) and add those to the Registry. The default value for execution-mode would be "production" ... thus you could easily have certain module classes loaded for normal production and a different set loaded for integration testing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (TAP5-966) TapestryFilter should be able add
additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or
other) execution configurations
Posted by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Howard M. Lewis Ship closed TAP5-966.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.2.0
> TapestryFilter should be able add additional modules to the Registry to accomidate different testing (or other) execution configurations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-966
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-966
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: tapestry-core
> Affects Versions: 5.2.0
> Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
>
> Frequently when integration testing an application, it is desirable to re-configure some parts of it (i.e., special symbol defaults, new service overrides, special service configurations), which currently is ad-hoc or otherwise awkward.
> How about if there was a special JVM system property: tapestry.execution-mode. This would be a comma-seperated list of mode names. For each one, the T5 filter would check for a <init-parameter> named "tapestry.foo-modules" (where "foo" is a mode name) and add those to the Registry. The default value for execution-mode would be "production" ... thus you could easily have certain module classes loaded for normal production and a different set loaded for integration testing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.