You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to community@apache.org by Ceki Gülcü <ce...@qos.ch> on 2003/02/12 14:32:20 UTC

Re: Licensing again.

Excellent initiative. You might want to share it with community@ before 
sending it to RMS. Is there a way to copy the FSF as a group and not just RMS?

I am directing the discussion to community@ according to Sam's suggestion.

At 08:26 12.02.2003 -0500, you wrote:

>>No, it is not up to the ASF. However, has the ASF attempted to clarify 
>>the matter with the FSF? Why not ask the FSF if importing java classes is 
>>considered as "derivative work" or simply as "work that uses the library"?
>>In the absence of a clear response from the FSF, there is no doubt that 
>>it is safer to shy away from LGPLed code.
>
>I'm drafting a letter from myself to Richard Stallman.  I had thought I'd 
>already sent it but I sent it to myself which is usually what I do when I 
>think something needs more editing.
>
>-Andy

--
Ceki 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: community-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: community-help@apache.org