You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mnemonic.apache.org by Gary <ga...@apache.org> on 2016/04/09 00:21:16 UTC
Propose the first version v0.1.0
Hi dev
I have closed the #MNEMONIC-15, the code has been re-formatted
according to the rules from #Mnemonic-10 as well as Apache License, so
by this point, should we based on the correct codebase to release the
first Mnemonic version v0.1.0 ? thanks.
B.R,
+Gary.
Re: Propose the first version v0.1.0
Posted by Gary <ga...@apache.org>.
Thanks Henry, That's what I need :)
On 4/8/2016 5:18 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Please also review the incubator release guide:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> It is not fully complete but should give idea on how to release in ASF as
> incubator podling.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes I agree, Thanks.
>>
>> On 4/8/2016 5:08 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
>>> Hi, Gary
>>>
>>> I think the new features (Arrow integration and Native Computing) are
>> not required for 0.1.0 release since they are in very early stage.
>>> 0.1.0 release will be the one we already fully tested and successfully
>> used in integration.
>>> I'd suggest we let the community to go through the code for a week.
>> let's see if there is any issues. Then we can do a vote.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yanping
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gary [mailto:garyw@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 3:21 PM
>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Propose the first version v0.1.0
>>>
>>> Hi dev
>>>
>>> I have closed the #MNEMONIC-15, the code has been re-formatted
>>> according to the rules from #Mnemonic-10 as well as Apache License, so
>>> by this point, should we based on the correct codebase to release the
>>> first Mnemonic version v0.1.0 ? thanks.
>>>
>>> B.R,
>>> +Gary.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Propose the first version v0.1.0
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Please also review the incubator release guide:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
It is not fully complete but should give idea on how to release in ASF as
incubator podling.
- Henry
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes I agree, Thanks.
>
> On 4/8/2016 5:08 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> > Hi, Gary
> >
> > I think the new features (Arrow integration and Native Computing) are
> not required for 0.1.0 release since they are in very early stage.
> >
> > 0.1.0 release will be the one we already fully tested and successfully
> used in integration.
> > I'd suggest we let the community to go through the code for a week.
> let's see if there is any issues. Then we can do a vote.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yanping
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gary [mailto:garyw@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 3:21 PM
> > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Propose the first version v0.1.0
> >
> > Hi dev
> >
> > I have closed the #MNEMONIC-15, the code has been re-formatted
> > according to the rules from #Mnemonic-10 as well as Apache License, so
> > by this point, should we based on the correct codebase to release the
> > first Mnemonic version v0.1.0 ? thanks.
> >
> > B.R,
> > +Gary.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: Propose the first version v0.1.0
Posted by Gary <ga...@apache.org>.
Yes I agree, Thanks.
On 4/8/2016 5:08 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> Hi, Gary
>
> I think the new features (Arrow integration and Native Computing) are not required for 0.1.0 release since they are in very early stage.
>
> 0.1.0 release will be the one we already fully tested and successfully used in integration.
> I'd suggest we let the community to go through the code for a week. let's see if there is any issues. Then we can do a vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Yanping
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary [mailto:garyw@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 3:21 PM
> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Propose the first version v0.1.0
>
> Hi dev
>
> I have closed the #MNEMONIC-15, the code has been re-formatted
> according to the rules from #Mnemonic-10 as well as Apache License, so
> by this point, should we based on the correct codebase to release the
> first Mnemonic version v0.1.0 ? thanks.
>
> B.R,
> +Gary.
>
>
>
RE: Propose the first version v0.1.0
Posted by "Wang, Yanping" <ya...@intel.com>.
Hi, Gary
I think the new features (Arrow integration and Native Computing) are not required for 0.1.0 release since they are in very early stage.
0.1.0 release will be the one we already fully tested and successfully used in integration.
I'd suggest we let the community to go through the code for a week. let's see if there is any issues. Then we can do a vote.
Thanks,
Yanping
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary [mailto:garyw@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 3:21 PM
To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Propose the first version v0.1.0
Hi dev
I have closed the #MNEMONIC-15, the code has been re-formatted
according to the rules from #Mnemonic-10 as well as Apache License, so
by this point, should we based on the correct codebase to release the
first Mnemonic version v0.1.0 ? thanks.
B.R,
+Gary.