You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Robert Munteanu (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/06/01 08:09:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-10441) make discovery independent from scheduler thread pools

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17354919#comment-17354919 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-10441:
-----------------------------------------

Shouldn't we fix the scheduler instead? Going back to using raw threads looks like a step back to me (though I don't know the domain that well).

> make discovery independent from scheduler thread pools
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-10441
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10441
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Discovery
>    Affects Versions: Discovery Commons 1.0.20, Discovery Impl 1.2.12, Discovery Base 2.0.8, Discovery Oak 1.2.30
>            Reporter: Stefan Egli
>            Assignee: Stefan Egli
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently discovery uses the commons.scheduler for a few but mission critical cases. Since the commons.scheduler doesn't guarantee timely execution - eg when the corresponding thread pool is full - discovery should become independent of commons.scheduler.
> The easiest solution is to spawn {{new Thread}} in those few cases. This shouldn't be problematic since these activities are not happening on a high frequency and are only short-lived.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)