You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hc.apache.org by "Pill, Juergen" <Ju...@softwareag.com> on 2003/01/16 15:12:40 UTC
FW: HttpClient performance in HttpConnection
Hello,
Anyone of the committers willing to commit this change?
In the Slide mailing list we have issues about the performance of the new
http-client package.
Best regards,
Juergen
-----Original Message-----
From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:ortwin.glueck@nose.ch]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 19.14 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: HttpClient performance in HttpConnection
This call is to disable the Nagle's algorithm for the TCP connection, right?
Citing from
http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid7_gci754347,00.html
(last section)
"Nagling has been broadly implemented across networks, including the
Internet, and is generally performed by default - although it is sometimes
considered to be undesirable in highly interactive environments, such as
some client/server situations. In such cases, nagling may be turned off
through use of the TCP_NODELAY sockets option."
Seems like this is our case :-)
+1 from me.
Pill, Juergen wrote:
> _socket.setTcpNoDelay(true);
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: FW: HttpClient performance in HttpConnection
Posted by Jeffrey Dever <js...@sympatico.ca>.
Checked in by Odi Jan 19.
Added a datamember for the boolean to pass to setTcpNoDelay() today.
Jandalf.
Pill, Juergen wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Anyone of the committers willing to commit this change?
>
>In the Slide mailing list we have issues about the performance of the new
>http-client package.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Juergen
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:ortwin.glueck@nose.ch]
>Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 19.14 PM
>To: Commons HttpClient Project
>Subject: Re: HttpClient performance in HttpConnection
>
>This call is to disable the Nagle's algorithm for the TCP connection, right?
>Citing from
>http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid7_gci754347,00.html
>(last section)
>"Nagling has been broadly implemented across networks, including the
>Internet, and is generally performed by default - although it is sometimes
>considered to be undesirable in highly interactive environments, such as
>some client/server situations. In such cases, nagling may be turned off
>through use of the TCP_NODELAY sockets option."
>Seems like this is our case :-)
>+1 from me.
>Pill, Juergen wrote:
>
>
>> _socket.setTcpNoDelay(true);
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
>