You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@harmony.apache.org by "George Harley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/04/19 18:35:46 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HARMONY-359) Java 5 Enhancement: One new
constructor Socket(Proxy p) in class java.net.Socket.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-359?page=comments#action_12375151 ]
George Harley commented on HARMONY-359:
---------------------------------------
Hi Richard,
We have a problem here. With the patch in place we get a compile error from the NIO component. In particular, the accept(Socket, SocketChannelImpl) method of org.apache.harmony.nio.internal.ServerSocketChannelImpl includes a call to the no args org.apache.harmony.luni.net.NetUtil.usingSocks() which no longer exists.
In my own sandbox the usingSocks() call -its on line 253 of ServerSocketChannelImpl.java - can be updated so that it passes in a null argument for the Proxy.
i.e.
if (NetUtil.usingSocks(null)) {
return super.accept();
}
With this tweak in place the NIO component builds fine and all of our unit tests pass. Passing in the null value to NetUtil.usingSocks(Proxy) means that the return value *only* depends on the value of the "socksProxyHost" system property (that behaviour required another little change to the NetUtil.usingSocks(Proxy) method - code now checks for null proxy in both of the if tests). Is this the kind of behaviour that you would expect to see in SocketChannelImpl's accept() method ?
I'll wait to hear back from you before progressing with this issue.
Thanks,
George
> Java 5 Enhancement: One new constructor Socket(Proxy p) in class java.net.Socket.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HARMONY-359
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-359
> Project: Harmony
> Type: New Feature
> Components: Classlib
> Reporter: Richard Liang
> Assignee: George Harley
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: luni.src.diff
>
> Hello,
> One new constructor method Socket(Proxy p) in class java.net.Socket, but not implemented in Harmony.
> I'll upload a patch both for code and test soon.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira