You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@juddi.apache.org by Alex O'Ree <al...@apache.org> on 2023/01/05 02:15:42 UTC

Re: [VOTE] The retirement of Apache jUDDI (moving to the Apache Attic)

No other votes? We had a full house on the last email thread.

On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 10:39 AM Alex O'Ree <al...@apache.org> wrote:

> Our voting policy for *releases *is below, however I'm not clear if
> there's another voting policy for other project wide issues. Does anyone
> remember or have documented any other voting policies for this project?
>
> This vote will be open for
> the next 72 hours per the release policy, which is:
> - the vote will be closed as soon as 6 hours have past and  >7 +1
> votes are received with no -1 vote being cast, or
>  - if after 12h >5 +1 votes have been cast with no -1 vote, or
>  - if after 24h if 3 +1 votes have been cast with no -1 vote, or failing
> that
>  - after 72h provided at least 3 +1 votes have been cast and there is
> a majority of +1 votes from the cast votes.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 8:36 AM Steve Viens <sv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (resend)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:42 AM Kurt Stam <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me
>>>
>>> —Kurt
>>>
>>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 01:00, Alex O'Ree <al...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> Resending...2 votes is not enough to pass, otherwise the board may have
>>> to take action directly
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:52 PM Steve Viens <sv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 from me as well.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 7:28 PM Alex O'Ree <al...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> After some discussion over the past month or so, there seems to be
>>>>> enough of a consensus to hold a vote on retiring Apache jUDDI. I've pretty
>>>>> much been the only maintainer for a while now and unfortunately have a
>>>>> number of outstanding issues that I can't solve without assistance from the
>>>>> community.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, most, if not all, of the committers and other community
>>>>> members have moved on to other projects. Usage of the UDDI specification
>>>>> and Apache jUDDI has never really been that high in general. Recently over
>>>>> the fast few years, JIRA issue reporting, mailing list traffic and all
>>>>> known out of band traffic have been near zero. Download statistics are
>>>>> pretty minimal as well and if anyone is using our libraries, there's little
>>>>> recent evidence to support that via mvnreponsitory.com's cross
>>>>> reference capabilities.
>>>>>
>>>>> The process for moving a project to the Attic is outlined here:
>>>>> https://attic.apache.org/process.html
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 11th, an email was dispatched to both the user and dev lists
>>>>> about this with no replies. It's time for the formal vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Steve Viens
>>>> sviens@gmail.com
>>>> 603-828-2397
>>>>
>>> --
>> Steve Viens
>> sviens@gmail.com
>> 603-828-2397
>>
>