You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Arun Patidar <ar...@hotwaxsystems.com> on 2019/04/01 04:44:25 UTC
Re: [PROPOSAL] Using code128 instead of code39 for barcode generation
+1
Kind Regards,
*Arun Patidar* | Manager, Enterprise Development
HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
Indore, M.P. 452010
Linkedin: *Arun Patidar* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/arunpatidar>
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 4:38 PM Pritam Kute <pr...@hotwaxsystems.com>
wrote:
> Yes, definitely we can use code128 all over the application.
>
> Kind Regards,
> --
> Pritam Kute
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:53 PM Aditya Sharma <
> aditya.sharma@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer
> > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > Indore,
> > M.P 452010
> > Linkedin: *Aditya Sharma* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-p-sharma/>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:14 PM Rishi Solanki <ri...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > --
> > > *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > > Indore,
> > > M.P 452010
> > > Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki*
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/>
> > > Direct: +91-9893287847
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:19 PM Pawan Verma <
> > > pawan.verma@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello All,
> > > >
> > > > While researching on OFBIZ-10743, I have found that currently, we are
> > > using
> > > > code39 to generate barcodes but there are some limitations of code39
> as
> > > it
> > > > only able to encrypt letters from A to Z, digits from 0 to 9 and an
> > > > additional set of special characters – “. $ % + – / *”.
> > > >
> > > > To enhance the support for more characters in barcode I would suggest
> > > using
> > > > code128 instead of code39.
> > > >
> > > > Below are some of the advantages of code128:
> > > >
> > > > 1. code128 supports all the 128 ASCII symbols.
> > > > 2. code128 standard is more concise and space-efficient. It also
> > > > provides its users with higher degrees of data security.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank You *Pritam Kute* for suggesting code128.
> > > >
> > > > Everyone, Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > *Pawan Verma* | Technical Consultant
> > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > > > Indore,
> > > > M.P. 452010
> > > > Linkedin: *Pawan Verma <
> > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/pawan-verma-aa1053a2/
> > > > >*
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Using code128 instead of code39 for barcode generation
Posted by Pawan Verma <pa...@hotwaxsystems.com>.
Thank You, everyone, for the response. I have created Jira OFBIZ-10896 for
the same, soon I will upload a patch for this.
--
Kind Regards,
*Pawan Verma* | Technical Consultant
HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore,
M.P. 452010
Linkedin: *Pawan Verma <https://www.linkedin.com/in/pawan-verma-aa1053a2/>*
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:35 AM Devanshu Vyas <vy...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 from my side as well.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Devanshu Vyas.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:27 AM Suraj Khurana <su...@hotwax.co>
> wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Suraj Khurana
> > TECHNICAL CONSULTANT
> > mobile: +91 9669750002
> > email: suraj.khurana@hotwax.co
> > www.hotwax.co
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:14 AM Arun Patidar <
> > arun.patidar@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > *Arun Patidar* | Manager, Enterprise Development
> > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > > Indore, M.P. 452010
> > > Linkedin: *Arun Patidar* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/arunpatidar>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 4:38 PM Pritam Kute <
> > pritam.kute@hotwaxsystems.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, definitely we can use code128 all over the application.
> > > >
> > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > --
> > > > Pritam Kute
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:53 PM Aditya Sharma <
> > > > aditya.sharma@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > > *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer
> > > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention
> Center,
> > > > > Indore,
> > > > > M.P 452010
> > > > > Linkedin: *Aditya Sharma* <
> > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-p-sharma/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:14 PM Rishi Solanki <
> > rishisolankii@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> > > > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention
> > Center,
> > > > > > Indore,
> > > > > > M.P 452010
> > > > > > Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki*
> > > > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/>
> > > > > > Direct: +91-9893287847
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:19 PM Pawan Verma <
> > > > > > pawan.verma@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > While researching on OFBIZ-10743, I have found that currently,
> we
> > > are
> > > > > > using
> > > > > > > code39 to generate barcodes but there are some limitations of
> > > code39
> > > > as
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > only able to encrypt letters from A to Z, digits from 0 to 9
> and
> > an
> > > > > > > additional set of special characters – “. $ % + – / *”.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To enhance the support for more characters in barcode I would
> > > suggest
> > > > > > using
> > > > > > > code128 instead of code39.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Below are some of the advantages of code128:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. code128 supports all the 128 ASCII symbols.
> > > > > > > 2. code128 standard is more concise and space-efficient. It
> > also
> > > > > > > provides its users with higher degrees of data security.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank You *Pritam Kute* for suggesting code128.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Everyone, Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > > > *Pawan Verma* | Technical Consultant
> > > > > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention
> > > Center,
> > > > > > > Indore,
> > > > > > > M.P. 452010
> > > > > > > Linkedin: *Pawan Verma <
> > > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/pawan-verma-aa1053a2/
> > > > > > > >*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Using code128 instead of code39 for barcode generation
Posted by Devanshu Vyas <vy...@gmail.com>.
+1 from my side as well.
Thanks & Regards,
Devanshu Vyas.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:27 AM Suraj Khurana <su...@hotwax.co>
wrote:
> +1.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Suraj Khurana
> TECHNICAL CONSULTANT
> mobile: +91 9669750002
> email: suraj.khurana@hotwax.co
> www.hotwax.co
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:14 AM Arun Patidar <
> arun.patidar@hotwaxsystems.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > *Arun Patidar* | Manager, Enterprise Development
> > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > Indore, M.P. 452010
> > Linkedin: *Arun Patidar* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/arunpatidar>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 4:38 PM Pritam Kute <
> pritam.kute@hotwaxsystems.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, definitely we can use code128 all over the application.
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > --
> > > Pritam Kute
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:53 PM Aditya Sharma <
> > > aditya.sharma@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer
> > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > > > Indore,
> > > > M.P 452010
> > > > Linkedin: *Aditya Sharma* <
> > https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-p-sharma/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:14 PM Rishi Solanki <
> rishisolankii@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> > > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention
> Center,
> > > > > Indore,
> > > > > M.P 452010
> > > > > Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki*
> > > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/>
> > > > > Direct: +91-9893287847
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:19 PM Pawan Verma <
> > > > > pawan.verma@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > While researching on OFBIZ-10743, I have found that currently, we
> > are
> > > > > using
> > > > > > code39 to generate barcodes but there are some limitations of
> > code39
> > > as
> > > > > it
> > > > > > only able to encrypt letters from A to Z, digits from 0 to 9 and
> an
> > > > > > additional set of special characters – “. $ % + – / *”.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To enhance the support for more characters in barcode I would
> > suggest
> > > > > using
> > > > > > code128 instead of code39.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Below are some of the advantages of code128:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. code128 supports all the 128 ASCII symbols.
> > > > > > 2. code128 standard is more concise and space-efficient. It
> also
> > > > > > provides its users with higher degrees of data security.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank You *Pritam Kute* for suggesting code128.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Everyone, Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > > *Pawan Verma* | Technical Consultant
> > > > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention
> > Center,
> > > > > > Indore,
> > > > > > M.P. 452010
> > > > > > Linkedin: *Pawan Verma <
> > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/pawan-verma-aa1053a2/
> > > > > > >*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Using code128 instead of code39 for barcode generation
Posted by Suraj Khurana <su...@hotwax.co>.
+1.
--
Best Regards,
Suraj Khurana
TECHNICAL CONSULTANT
mobile: +91 9669750002
email: suraj.khurana@hotwax.co
www.hotwax.co
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:14 AM Arun Patidar <ar...@hotwaxsystems.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Kind Regards,
> *Arun Patidar* | Manager, Enterprise Development
> HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> Indore, M.P. 452010
> Linkedin: *Arun Patidar* <https://www.linkedin.com/in/arunpatidar>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 4:38 PM Pritam Kute <pritam.kute@hotwaxsystems.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, definitely we can use code128 all over the application.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > --
> > Pritam Kute
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:53 PM Aditya Sharma <
> > aditya.sharma@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer
> > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > > Indore,
> > > M.P 452010
> > > Linkedin: *Aditya Sharma* <
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-p-sharma/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:14 PM Rishi Solanki <rishisolankii@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > --
> > > > *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > > > Indore,
> > > > M.P 452010
> > > > Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki*
> > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/>
> > > > Direct: +91-9893287847
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:19 PM Pawan Verma <
> > > > pawan.verma@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello All,
> > > > >
> > > > > While researching on OFBIZ-10743, I have found that currently, we
> are
> > > > using
> > > > > code39 to generate barcodes but there are some limitations of
> code39
> > as
> > > > it
> > > > > only able to encrypt letters from A to Z, digits from 0 to 9 and an
> > > > > additional set of special characters – “. $ % + – / *”.
> > > > >
> > > > > To enhance the support for more characters in barcode I would
> suggest
> > > > using
> > > > > code128 instead of code39.
> > > > >
> > > > > Below are some of the advantages of code128:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. code128 supports all the 128 ASCII symbols.
> > > > > 2. code128 standard is more concise and space-efficient. It also
> > > > > provides its users with higher degrees of data security.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank You *Pritam Kute* for suggesting code128.
> > > > >
> > > > > Everyone, Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > *Pawan Verma* | Technical Consultant
> > > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention
> Center,
> > > > > Indore,
> > > > > M.P. 452010
> > > > > Linkedin: *Pawan Verma <
> > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/pawan-verma-aa1053a2/
> > > > > >*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>