You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> on 2008/01/28 01:04:53 UTC
[VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository 1.0.1 release
I would like to call a vote on the framework and main 1.0.2 as well as
on the bundlerepository 1.0.1
release. The source release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
http://people.apache.org/~pauls/felix-1.0.2.html
Additionally, a binary release is included on the page as a
convenience download as well as the framework, main, and
bundlerepository binaries and poms in
order to make them available via maven.
Please vote to approve these release archives:
[ ] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.2 framework and main releases as well as
the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release.
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository 1.0.1 release
Posted by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>.
Good catch!
I did run rat but somehow I must have missed this one :-(
Furthermore, I just realized that I missed updating the copyright to
2008 as well (not my day apparently).
The vote has failed. I'll cut a 1.0.3 release for framework and main
and a 1.0.2 for bundlerepository asap.
regards,
Karl
On Jan 28, 2008 4:06 AM, Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net> wrote:
>
> On 28/01/2008, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to call a vote on the framework and main 1.0.2 as well as
> > on the bundlerepository 1.0.1
> > release. The source release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
> > message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~pauls/felix-1.0.2.html
> >
> > Additionally, a binary release is included on the page as a
> > convenience download as well as the framework, main, and
> > bundlerepository binaries and poms in
> > order to make them available via maven.
> >
> > Please vote to approve these release archives:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.2 framework and main releases as well as
> > the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release.
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
>
> sorry: -1 for 1.0.2, as unfortunately I found an issue when running RAT:
>
> framework-1.0.2
> /src/main/java/org/apache/felix/framework/util/CompoundEnumeration.java
>
> is lacking a license header ...also, should this properties file have a
> license header?
>
> framework-1.0.2
> /src/main/resources/org/apache/felix/framework/Felix.properties
>
> however, I can vote +1 for the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release, as everything
> checks out ok
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository
1.0.1 release
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>>>
>>> sorry: -1 for 1.0.2, as unfortunately I found an issue when running RAT:
>>>
>>> framework-1.0.2
>>> /src/main/java/org/apache/felix/framework/util/CompoundEnumeration.java
>>>
>>
>> Crap. I had originally added the header to that file, but I did a
>> revert and a re-apply of the patch and forgot to do it again.
>>
>>> is lacking a license header ...also, should this properties file have a
>>> license header?
>>>
>>> framework-1.0.2
>>> /src/main/resources/org/apache/felix/framework/Felix.properties
>>>
>>
>> We never have and since this only has the version number in it, I
>> don't think it can be construed as being in any way creative, so I
>> don't think it needs a license header.
>>
>> I guess we will have to see what Karl wants to do about the above.
>>
> I agree that the missing header for the properties file is not that
> important (however we should add it for future releases). But I think
> the missing header in the source code is an issue. We've been very picky
> about releases in the past (which is good) and I don't see a reason
> why we should make an exception here.
>
> So, I vote -1 as well - let's fix this issue and recut a 1.0.3 release.
>
Argh, this vote is for two releases at the same time :( So just to
clarify, I vote -1 for the framework release.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository
1.0.1 release
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>> I agree that the missing header for the properties file is not that
>>> important (however we should add it for future releases).
>>
>> I was told that headers were only for files that contain something
>> creative. Felix.properties only contains:
>>
>> felix.version=${pom.version}
>>
> Yes, that's true - but if we just add the header, tools like rat will
> not fail anymore (unless we have a real problem).
True.
-> richard
>
>
> Carsten
>
Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository
1.0.1 release
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> I agree that the missing header for the properties file is not that
>> important (however we should add it for future releases).
>
> I was told that headers were only for files that contain something
> creative. Felix.properties only contains:
>
> felix.version=${pom.version}
>
Yes, that's true - but if we just add the header, tools like rat will
not fail anymore (unless we have a real problem).
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository
1.0.1 release
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> I agree that the missing header for the properties file is not that
> important (however we should add it for future releases).
I was told that headers were only for files that contain something
creative. Felix.properties only contains:
felix.version=${pom.version}
-> richard
> But I think the missing header in the source code is an issue. We've
> been very picky about releases in the past (which is good) and I don't
> see a reason
> why we should make an exception here.
>
> So, I vote -1 as well - let's fix this issue and recut a 1.0.3 release.
>
> Carsten
>
Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository
1.0.1 release
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>>
>> sorry: -1 for 1.0.2, as unfortunately I found an issue when running RAT:
>>
>> framework-1.0.2
>> /src/main/java/org/apache/felix/framework/util/CompoundEnumeration.java
>>
>
> Crap. I had originally added the header to that file, but I did a revert
> and a re-apply of the patch and forgot to do it again.
>
>> is lacking a license header ...also, should this properties file have a
>> license header?
>>
>> framework-1.0.2
>> /src/main/resources/org/apache/felix/framework/Felix.properties
>>
>
> We never have and since this only has the version number in it, I don't
> think it can be construed as being in any way creative, so I don't think
> it needs a license header.
>
> I guess we will have to see what Karl wants to do about the above.
>
I agree that the missing header for the properties file is not that
important (however we should add it for future releases). But I think
the missing header in the source code is an issue. We've been very picky
about releases in the past (which is good) and I don't see a reason
why we should make an exception here.
So, I vote -1 as well - let's fix this issue and recut a 1.0.3 release.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository
1.0.1 release
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> On 28/01/2008, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would like to call a vote on the framework and main 1.0.2 as well as
>> on the bundlerepository 1.0.1
>> release. The source release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
>> message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~pauls/felix-1.0.2.html
>>
>> Additionally, a binary release is included on the page as a
>> convenience download as well as the framework, main, and
>> bundlerepository binaries and poms in
>> order to make them available via maven.
>>
>> Please vote to approve these release archives:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.2 framework and main releases as well as
>> the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release.
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>>
>
> sorry: -1 for 1.0.2, as unfortunately I found an issue when running RAT:
>
> framework-1.0.2
> /src/main/java/org/apache/felix/framework/util/CompoundEnumeration.java
>
Crap. I had originally added the header to that file, but I did a revert
and a re-apply of the patch and forgot to do it again.
> is lacking a license header ...also, should this properties file have a
> license header?
>
> framework-1.0.2
> /src/main/resources/org/apache/felix/framework/Felix.properties
>
We never have and since this only has the version number in it, I don't
think it can be construed as being in any way creative, so I don't think
it needs a license header.
I guess we will have to see what Karl wants to do about the above.
-> richard
> however, I can vote +1 for the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release, as everything
> checks out ok
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository 1.0.1 release
Posted by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 28, 2008 4:06 AM, Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net> wrote:
>
> On 28/01/2008, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to call a vote on the framework and main 1.0.2 as well as
> > on the bundlerepository 1.0.1
> > release. The source release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
> > message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~pauls/felix-1.0.2.html
> >
> > Additionally, a binary release is included on the page as a
> > convenience download as well as the framework, main, and
> > bundlerepository binaries and poms in
> > order to make them available via maven.
> >
> > Please vote to approve these release archives:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.2 framework and main releases as well as
> > the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release.
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
>
> sorry: -1 for 1.0.2, as unfortunately I found an issue when running RAT:
>
> framework-1.0.2
> /src/main/java/org/apache/felix/framework/util/CompoundEnumeration.java
>
> is lacking a license header ...also, should this properties file have a
> license header?
>
> framework-1.0.2
> /src/main/resources/org/apache/felix/framework/Felix.properties
No, this doesn't include anything that needs to be copyrighted - it's
only the version number :-)
regards,
Karl
> however, I can vote +1 for the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release, as everything
> checks out ok
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository 1.0.1 release
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
On 28/01/2008, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would like to call a vote on the framework and main 1.0.2 as well as
> on the bundlerepository 1.0.1
> release. The source release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
> message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~pauls/felix-1.0.2.html
>
> Additionally, a binary release is included on the page as a
> convenience download as well as the framework, main, and
> bundlerepository binaries and poms in
> order to make them available via maven.
>
> Please vote to approve these release archives:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.2 framework and main releases as well as
> the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release.
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
sorry: -1 for 1.0.2, as unfortunately I found an issue when running RAT:
framework-1.0.2
/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/framework/util/CompoundEnumeration.java
is lacking a license header ...also, should this properties file have a
license header?
framework-1.0.2
/src/main/resources/org/apache/felix/framework/Felix.properties
however, I can vote +1 for the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release, as everything
checks out ok
--
Cheers, Stuart
Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.0.2 framework and main release as well as bundlerepository 1.0.1 release
Posted by Alin Dreghiciu <ad...@gmail.com>.
+1 (not binding)
Alin
On Jan 28, 2008 8:04 AM, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to call a vote on the framework and main 1.0.2 as well as
> on the bundlerepository 1.0.1
> release. The source release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
> message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~pauls/felix-1.0.2.html
>
> Additionally, a binary release is included on the page as a
> convenience download as well as the framework, main, and
> bundlerepository binaries and poms in
> order to make them available via maven.
>
> Please vote to approve these release archives:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.2 framework and main releases as well as
> the bundlerepository 1.0.1 release.
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>