You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@juddi.apache.org by Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/05 15:33:12 UTC
[VOTE] switch jUDDI to Git
Hi guys,
We have had our jUDDI github share (https://github.com/apache/juddi) for
about a year now. The process to accept pull requests is however a bit
tedious. This is a list of projects that are fully switched (see
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf). And here is nice picture on
how a typical workflow would be where pull request are issued on github
but merged in into git-wip-us.
http://cordova.apache.org/wiki-images/contributor-git.png
Source: http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/GitWorkflow
This seems to make accepting pull requests a lot easier, so the proposal
at hand it to switch to Git.
My vote: +1,
This vote will be open for 72 hrs.
Cheers,
--Kurt
Re: [VOTE] switch jUDDI to Git
Posted by Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com>.
You can track progress at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7288
On 2/8/14, 8:00 PM, Kurt T Stam wrote:
> This vote is now closed and it passed with 4+ and 0-, all votes weere
> binding. Looks like we're going to move to git!
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Kurt
>
> On 2/5/14, 9:09 PM, Alex O'Ree wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Tom Cunningham <tcunning@redhat.com
>> <ma...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On 2/5/14, 9:33 AM, Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> We have had our jUDDI github share
>>> (https://github.com/apache/juddi) for about a year now. The
>>> process to accept pull requests is however a bit tedious. This
>>> is a list of projects that are fully switched (see
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf). And here is nice
>>> picture on how a typical workflow would be where pull request
>>> are issued on github but merged in into git-wip-us.
>>>
>>> http://cordova.apache.org/wiki-images/contributor-git.png
>>>
>>> Source: http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/GitWorkflow
>>>
>>> This seems to make accepting pull requests a lot easier, so the
>>> proposal at hand it to switch to Git.
>>>
>>> My vote: +1,
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for 72 hrs.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> --Kurt
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] switch jUDDI to Git
Posted by Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com>.
This vote is now closed and it passed with 4+ and 0-, all votes weere
binding. Looks like we're going to move to git!
Cheers,
--Kurt
On 2/5/14, 9:09 PM, Alex O'Ree wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Tom Cunningham <tcunning@redhat.com
> <ma...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> On 2/5/14, 9:33 AM, Kurt T Stam wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> We have had our jUDDI github share
>> (https://github.com/apache/juddi) for about a year now. The
>> process to accept pull requests is however a bit tedious. This is
>> a list of projects that are fully switched (see
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf). And here is nice
>> picture on how a typical workflow would be where pull request are
>> issued on github but merged in into git-wip-us.
>>
>> http://cordova.apache.org/wiki-images/contributor-git.png
>>
>> Source: http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/GitWorkflow
>>
>> This seems to make accepting pull requests a lot easier, so the
>> proposal at hand it to switch to Git.
>>
>> My vote: +1,
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hrs.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --Kurt
>
>
Re: [VOTE] switch jUDDI to Git
Posted by Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Tom Cunningham <tc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 2/5/14, 9:33 AM, Kurt T Stam wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We have had our jUDDI github share (https://github.com/apache/juddi) for
> about a year now. The process to accept pull requests is however a bit
> tedious. This is a list of projects that are fully switched (see
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf). And here is nice picture on how
> a typical workflow would be where pull request are issued on github but
> merged in into git-wip-us.
>
> [image: http://cordova.apache.org/wiki-images/contributor-git.png]
>
> Source: http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/GitWorkflow
>
> This seems to make accepting pull requests a lot easier, so the proposal
> at hand it to switch to Git.
>
> My vote: +1,
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hrs.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Kurt
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] switch jUDDI to Git
Posted by Tom Cunningham <tc...@redhat.com>.
+1
On 2/5/14, 9:33 AM, Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We have had our jUDDI github share (https://github.com/apache/juddi)
> for about a year now. The process to accept pull requests is however a
> bit tedious. This is a list of projects that are fully switched (see
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf). And here is nice picture on
> how a typical workflow would be where pull request are issued on
> github but merged in into git-wip-us.
>
> http://cordova.apache.org/wiki-images/contributor-git.png
>
> Source: http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/GitWorkflow
>
> This seems to make accepting pull requests a lot easier, so the
> proposal at hand it to switch to Git.
>
> My vote: +1,
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hrs.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Kurt
Re: [VOTE] switch jUDDI to Git
Posted by Anil Saldhana <an...@yahoo.com>.
+1
~~~~~~~~~~
Sent from phone.
> On Feb 5, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We have had our jUDDI github share (https://github.com/apache/juddi) for about a year now. The process to accept pull requests is however a bit tedious. This is a list of projects that are fully switched (see https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf). And here is nice picture on how a typical workflow would be where pull request are issued on github but merged in into git-wip-us.
>
> <mime-attachment.png>
>
> Source: http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/GitWorkflow
>
> This seems to make accepting pull requests a lot easier, so the proposal at hand it to switch to Git.
>
> My vote: +1,
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hrs.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Kurt