java.lang.ClassCastException at ..component.html.ext.HtmlSelectOneRadio.validateValue

[Alvin Antony <Al...@consol.de>]

Hallo Friends,
 
I am getting this exception when i use forceid=true and forceidIndex=false
with facelets.
 
I had a look in the code and the code is expecting a Boolean type but
returned is of Type String.
 
The code is here 
 
Boolean forceIdIndex = (Boolean) this.getAttributes().get("forceIdIndex");
 
Is this a bug in myfaces/facelets, or am I doing something wrong? I had the
same problem before in HtmlComponentUtils.getClientId() method where I
patched the code at the moment myself. 
 
Thanks,
 
Alvin
 
 
alvin.antony@consol.de                     ConSol* Software GmbH
Phone +49-89-45841-191                     Consulting & Solutions
Fax   +49-89-45841-111                     Franziskanerstr. 38
Mobile+49-160-97340713
http://www.consol.de <http://www.consol.de/>                        81669
München
 

Facelets, forceId and forceIdIndex

[alvin antony <Al...@consol.de>]

Hallo,

does anybody know, where the problem is? please see the attached mail  
which  i send yesterday.

I get the following exception when i use the t:htmlselectoneRadio in  
facelets. java.lang.ClassCastException  
at ..component.html.ext.HtmlSelectOneRadio.validateValue().


does anybody had this problem before or i am the first one who uses   
a htmlSelectOneRadio with facelets having forceId=true and  
forceidIndex=false?

Thank you very much for any  help

Alvin


Am 02.12.2005 um 15:15 schrieb Alvin Antony:

> Hallo Friends,
>
>
>
> I am getting this exception when i use forceid=true and  
> forceidIndex=false with facelets.
>
>
>
> I had a look in the code and the code is expecting a Boolean type  
> but returned is of Type String.
>
>
>
> The code snippet from HtmlSelectOneRadio is here
>
>
>
> Boolean forceIdIndex = (Boolean) this.getAttributes().get 
> ("forceIdIndex");
>
>
>
> Is this a bug in myfaces/facelets or am I doing something wrong? I  
> had the same problem before in HtmlComponentUtils.getClientId()  
> method where I patched the code at the moment myself.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Alvin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>