You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ozone.apache.org by "ChenSammi (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/08/17 08:05:48 UTC
[PR] HDDS-16200. Flaky container balancer robot test [ozone]
ChenSammi opened a new pull request, #11033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/11033
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Random failures due to wait timeout.
```
Verify Container Balancer for RATIS/EC containers | FAIL |
Keyword 'Run Balancer Verbose History Status' failed after retrying for 40 seconds. The last error was: 'ContainerBalancer is Running.
--
ozone-balancer-EC :: Smoketest ozone cluster startup | FAIL |
```
## What is the link to the Apache JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-16200
## How was this patch tested?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@ozone.apache.org
Re: [PR] HDDS-16200. Flaky container balancer robot test [ozone]
Posted by "ChenSammi (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
ChenSammi commented on PR #11033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/11033#issuecomment-5323474957
> @ChenSammi Thanks for the fix, It seems before also in [PR](https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/7569) flaky test was fixed. Change looks fine to me to increase time here. Can you try to run flaky workflow to see if it is working always?
Usually rerun will solve the problem. So the root cause is the task cannot be finished in 40s. This https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/7569 changes the way from blind sleep 40s, to periodically check in 40s, but the max time wait is still 40s. I think extend max 40s to 90s should be enough to cover the execution according to this which I mentioned in the JIRA description.
```
ContainerBalancer is Running.
Started at: 2026-08-17 04:47:45
Balancing duration: 46s
Size scheduled to move 102 MB
Moved data size 62 MB
Scheduled to move containers 5
Already moved containers 3
Failed to move containers 0
Failed to move containers by timeout 0
...
Completed iteration history:
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@ozone.apache.org
Re: [PR] HDDS-16200. Flaky container balancer robot test [ozone]
Posted by "ashishkumar50 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
ashishkumar50 merged PR #11033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/11033
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@ozone.apache.org