You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "angela (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/25 09:09:04 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-6093) Find a new home for NodeUtil and
TreeUtil including cleanup
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15976556#comment-15976556 ]
angela edited comment on OAK-6093 at 4/25/17 9:08 AM:
------------------------------------------------------
[~rombert], a quick search found a lot more usage of {{TreeUtil}} in the productive code compared to {{NodeUtil}}. I would rather get rid of the {{NodeUtil}} altogether (or move it to the test space, where it is primarily used).
was (Author: anchela):
[~rombert], a quick search found a lot more usage of {{TreeUtil}} in the productive code compared to {{NodeUtil}}. I would rather get rid of the {{NodeUtil}} altogether.
> Find a new home for NodeUtil and TreeUtil including cleanup
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6093
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6093
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: core
> Reporter: angela
>
> see http://markmail.org/message/fczbcadrosg3k6x4?q=ApproximateCounter+list:org%2Eapache%2Ejackrabbit%2Eoak-dev+from:%22Robert+Munteanu%22&page=1 for the corresponding discussion.
> As mentioned in the issue and discussed with [~mduerig] in private I would also suggest that we try to get rid of the duplicated functionality. Those 2 classes do almost the same thing and I am not totally convinced that we really need to keep both... but I would like to hear other opinions on this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)