JAXB tree for spec dds

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

While trying to figure out how to get geronimo and openejb to cooperate better building jndi trees I spent  couple days converting geronimo to use openejb's openejb-jee jaxb tree for spec dds.  AFAICT it works as well as the xmlbeans tree and is a lot easier to work with.  It brings the conflicts between geronimo and openejb into clearer focus for me, and currently this is resulting in more tck failures.  However I think I will be able to come up with a good solution for building the jndi tree now.

If there are no objections I'd like to clean this up a little bit and commit it tomorrow.

thanks
david jencks

Re: JAXB tree for spec dds

[David Blevins <da...@visi.com>]

On Jun 23, 2010, at 11:46 PM, David Jencks wrote:

> While trying to figure out how to get geronimo and openejb to cooperate better building jndi trees I spent  couple days converting geronimo to use openejb's openejb-jee jaxb tree for spec dds.  AFAICT it works as well as the xmlbeans tree and is a lot easier to work with.  It brings the conflicts between geronimo and openejb into clearer focus for me, and currently this is resulting in more tck failures.  However I think I will be able to come up with a good solution for building the jndi tree now.
> 
> If there are no objections I'd like to clean this up a little bit and commit it tomorrow.

Will certainly clean up the integration code where we had to convert these things back and forth from jaxb to xmlbeans.

-David

Re: JAXB tree for spec dds

[Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>]

On 6/24/2010 2:46 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> While trying to figure out how to get geronimo and openejb to cooperate better building jndi trees I spent  couple days converting geronimo to use openejb's openejb-jee jaxb tree for spec dds.  AFAICT it works as well as the xmlbeans tree and is a lot easier to work with.  It brings the conflicts between geronimo and openejb into clearer focus for me, and currently this is resulting in more tck failures.  However I think I will be able to come up with a good solution for building the jndi tree now.
>
> If there are no objections I'd like to clean this up a little bit and commit it tomorrow.
>    

In my opinion, making the interface between Geronimo and openejb cleaner 
can't be anything but a good thing.  Go for it.

Rick
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>