Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1

[James Dixson <di...@gmail.com>]

+1 from me too.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Gaurav Sandhir (gsandhir)
<gs...@cisco.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manoj Ganesan [mailto:manoj.ganesan@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:05 PM
> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [vote] fix for etch-69 in release 1.1
>
> + 1 for the inclusion.
> Manoj.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:20 PM, scott comer <we...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> ok, folks, i need some votes to proceed...
>>
>> scott out
>>
>>
>> scott comer wrote:
>>
>>> currently release 1.1 is pretty much in the can. but since there is a
>
>>> fix for this path problem for maven users that rick bolkey found so
>>> long ago, what do you say for putting it in 1.1?
>>>
>>> it doesn't break anything, and brian smith did check out the code and
>
>>> built his own version with the fix and it solved the problem.
>>>
>>> i've put a 1.0.2 special up (location noted in the comments of the
>>> issue) if anyone else is setup to try it. mainly i think that might
> be rick.
>>>
>>> +1 (include fix for etch-69 in release 1.1)
>>>
>>> scott out
>>>
>>>
>>
>