You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by "Rentao Wu (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/06/04 23:28:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-3624) Oozie scheduled workflows fail when yarn/hdfs cluster changes

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Rentao Wu updated OOZIE-3624:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
When the yarn cluster which is used by a Oozie scheduled workflow gets recreated with a new cluster, future runs of the scheduled workflow will break as they depend on the workflow/ job.properties files which was deployed on hdfs.

 

The yarn jobtracker will also no longer work due to:

 

 
{noformat}
Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(org.apache.hadoop.security.token.SecretManager$InvalidToken): appattempt_1622844783178_0004_000002 not found in AMRMTokenSecretManager.
 
{noformat}
 

It seem there are some tokens store in yarn and when the yarn cluster gets terminated and replaced with a new yarn cluster. The oozie launcher will hit this error message. This invalid token message also happen when I configure oozie to use a remote yarn cluster.

The yarn cluster getting recreated is a common case in cloud, I'm wondering is there a way for oozie to be resilient to the underlying yarn cluster changing?

 

Also is it supported for workflow/coordinator/ job.properties files to be deployed on s3 instead of hdfs?

 

 

 

 

  was:
When the yarn cluster which is used by a Oozie scheduled workflow gets recreated with a new cluster, future runs of the scheduled workflow will break as they depend on the workflow/ job.properties files which was deployed on hdfs.

 

The yarn jobtracker will also no longer work due to:

 

 
{noformat}
Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(org.apache.hadoop.security.token.SecretManager$InvalidToken): appattempt_1622844783178_0004_000002 not found in AMRMTokenSecretManager.
 
{noformat}
 

It seem there are some tokens store in yarn and when the yarn cluster gets terminated and replaced with a new yarn cluster. The oozie launcher will hit this error message.

The yarn cluster getting recreated is a common case in cloud, I'm wondering is there a way for oozie to be resilient to the underlying yarn cluster being ephemeral?

 

is it supported for workflow/coordinator/ job.properties files to be deployed on s3 instead of hdfs?

 

 

 

 


> Oozie scheduled workflows fail when yarn/hdfs cluster changes
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-3624
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3624
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: coordinator, workflow
>    Affects Versions: 5.2.0
>            Reporter: Rentao Wu
>            Priority: Major
>
> When the yarn cluster which is used by a Oozie scheduled workflow gets recreated with a new cluster, future runs of the scheduled workflow will break as they depend on the workflow/ job.properties files which was deployed on hdfs.
>  
> The yarn jobtracker will also no longer work due to:
>  
>  
> {noformat}
> Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(org.apache.hadoop.security.token.SecretManager$InvalidToken): appattempt_1622844783178_0004_000002 not found in AMRMTokenSecretManager.
>  
> {noformat}
>  
> It seem there are some tokens store in yarn and when the yarn cluster gets terminated and replaced with a new yarn cluster. The oozie launcher will hit this error message. This invalid token message also happen when I configure oozie to use a remote yarn cluster.
> The yarn cluster getting recreated is a common case in cloud, I'm wondering is there a way for oozie to be resilient to the underlying yarn cluster changing?
>  
> Also is it supported for workflow/coordinator/ job.properties files to be deployed on s3 instead of hdfs?
>  
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)