uima-as 2.2.2-incubating release was approved by the IPMC !

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

I will update the web site, put the artifacts on the 
.../dist/incubator/uima site, including rebuilding the eclipse update 
site to include the new uima-as components.

I have never done "maven" repository uploads - do we need this for 
uima-as?  If so, I'll climb the learning curve (with others's help :-) )

-Marshall

Re: No "Maven" uploads for uima-as jars?

[Eddie Epstein <ea...@gmail.com>]

Can't think of a reason why we need it right away.

Eddie

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:

> No one responded to the question at the bottom of this previous note.
>
> I'm thinking that we don't need maven repository (the special incubator
> repository) upload for the uima-as jars, but I could be wrong.  Anyone have
> a thought on the need for this?
>
> -Marshall
>
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>
>> I will update the web site, put the artifacts on the
>> .../dist/incubator/uima site, including rebuilding the eclipse update site
>> to include the new uima-as components.
>>
>> I have never done "maven" repository uploads - do we need this for
>> uima-as?  If so, I'll climb the learning curve (with others's help :-) )
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>>

No "Maven" uploads for uima-as jars?

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

No one responded to the question at the bottom of this previous note.

I'm thinking that we don't need maven repository (the special incubator 
repository) upload for the uima-as jars, but I could be wrong.  Anyone have a 
thought on the need for this?

-Marshall

Marshall Schor wrote:
> I will update the web site, put the artifacts on the 
> .../dist/incubator/uima site, including rebuilding the eclipse update 
> site to include the new uima-as components.
> 
> I have never done "maven" repository uploads - do we need this for 
> uima-as?  If so, I'll climb the learning curve (with others's help :-) )
> 
> -Marshall
> 
> 

Re: uima-as 2.2.2-incubating release was approved by the IPMC !

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

OK - I figured out how to upload the uima-as poms and jars to the
incubating repository, and that's now done.

-Marshall

Michael Baessler wrote:
> I think a Maven repository upload is necessary if the jars that will be uploaded have public APIs.
> In that case users will have dependencies in their own code to these jars. In case of annotator
> components the users don't have code dependencies to these jars so an upload is not necessary from
> my point of view.
>
> I'm not sure about UIMA-AS. If users integrate UIMA-AS in their application, will they have code
> dependencies to some UIMA-AS jars?
>
> -- Michael
>
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>   
>> I will update the web site, put the artifacts on the
>> .../dist/incubator/uima site, including rebuilding the eclipse update
>> site to include the new uima-as components.
>>
>> I have never done "maven" repository uploads - do we need this for
>> uima-as?  If so, I'll climb the learning curve (with others's help :-) )
>>
>> -Marshall
>>     
>
>
>
>   

Re: uima-as 2.2.2-incubating release was approved by the IPMC !

[Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>]

I think a Maven repository upload is necessary if the jars that will be uploaded have public APIs.
In that case users will have dependencies in their own code to these jars. In case of annotator
components the users don't have code dependencies to these jars so an upload is not necessary from
my point of view.

I'm not sure about UIMA-AS. If users integrate UIMA-AS in their application, will they have code
dependencies to some UIMA-AS jars?

-- Michael

Marshall Schor wrote:
> I will update the web site, put the artifacts on the
> .../dist/incubator/uima site, including rebuilding the eclipse update
> site to include the new uima-as components.
> 
> I have never done "maven" repository uploads - do we need this for
> uima-as?  If so, I'll climb the learning curve (with others's help :-) )
> 
> -Marshall