You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/03/01 08:24:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-7366) Affinity assignment exception in service processor during multiple nodes join

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16381673#comment-16381673 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-7366:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user xtern reopened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3451

    IGNITE-7366 Service reassignment with merge exchanges.

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/xtern/ignite IGNITE-7366

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3451.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #3451
    
----
commit 2398cf3a5c9a91eaf15336cd5699a2f83e588bbc
Author: pereslegin-pa <xx...@...>
Date:   2018-03-01T07:56:09Z

    IGNITE-7366 Fixed ready topology await on merge exchanges.

----


> Affinity assignment exception in service processor during multiple nodes join
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-7366
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7366
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: compute
>    Affects Versions: 2.3
>            Reporter: Ilya Kasnacheev
>            Assignee: Pavel Pereslegin
>            Priority: Major
>
> When two nodes which are deploying services join at the same time, and exception is observed:
> {code}
> SEVERE: Error when executing service: null
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Getting affinity for topology version earlier than affinity is calculated [locNode=TcpDiscoveryNode [id=245d4bec-0384-4808-b66d-d2340930207f..., discPort=37500, order=2, intOrder=2, lastExchangeTime=1515394551283, loc=true, ver=2.3.0#20171028-sha1:8add7fd5, isClient=false], grp=ignite-sys-cache, topVer=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=3, minorTopVer=0], head=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=0], history=[AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=2, minorTopVer=0], AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=2, minorTopVer=1], AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=0]]]
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.affinity.GridAffinityAssignmentCache.cachedAffinity(GridAffinityAssignmentCache.java:514)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.affinity.GridAffinityAssignmentCache.nodes(GridAffinityAssignmentCache.java:419)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAffinityManager.nodesByPartition(GridCacheAffinityManager.java:220)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAffinityManager.primaryByPartition(GridCacheAffinityManager.java:256)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAffinityManager.primaryByKey(GridCacheAffinityManager.java:247)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAffinityManager.primaryByKey(GridCacheAffinityManager.java:271)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.service.GridServiceProcessor$TopologyListener$1.run0(GridServiceProcessor.java:1771)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.service.GridServiceProcessor$DepRunnable.run(GridServiceProcessor.java:1958)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> {code}
> This may be caused by exchange merges. There are 4 nodes joining topology. When nodes 3 and 4 join at the same time, exchanges for [3, 0] and [4, 0] are merged. But, TopologyListener in service processor is notified about topVer [3, 0], for which there is no affinity because exchange has already moved forward to [4, 0].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)