You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@jmeter.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2022/01/19 10:06:07 UTC

[Bug 65808] New: Log4J Security Risk in 5.4.3

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65808

            Bug ID: 65808
           Summary: Log4J Security Risk  in 5.4.3
           Product: JMeter
           Version: 5.4.3
          Hardware: PC
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTTP
          Assignee: issues@jmeter.apache.org
          Reporter: nsoni31@dxc.com
  Target Milestone: JMETER_5.5

Hi Jmeter team,

We are using Jmeter for our project  . This mail is regarding the security risk
because of log4J . We were using Jmeter4.0 (planning to upgraded to JMeter
5.4.3  version) . But according to  release notes still log4J security risk is
there in 5.4.3.


We need following help from you:
1.      It would be helpful if we can get fix for this issue .
2.      We have found that latest version of JMeter 5.4.3 which have 2.17.0
Log4j Jar 

But 2.17 is also having two direct vulnerabilities , Details of both slows that
they are vulnerable .



In Maven
repository(https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-core)
, we have 2.17.1 version  which shows no vulnerability , so can you please
advice that can we use 2.17.1 jar with apache Jmeter 5.4.3 version . Is that
supported if we do it and will resolve the threat of currently log4j.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65808] Log4J Security Risk in 5.4.3

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65808

Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 OS|                            |All
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 65748 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.