You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Pascal Schumacher (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/02/14 19:37:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (TEXT-80) StrLookup API confusing

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEXT-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Pascal Schumacher resolved TEXT-80.
-----------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
         Assignee: Pascal Schumacher
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.0)
                   1.3

StrLookup will deprecated and replaced with StringLookup in 1.3.

> StrLookup API confusing
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: TEXT-80
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEXT-80
>             Project: Commons Text
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Etienne Neveu
>            Assignee: Pascal Schumacher
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.3
>
>
> [bayard: copying this from LANG-564]
> I don't see the point of having a generic type parameter on the StrLookup class, if it's not used anywhere. No method / field in StrLookup references this type parameter. IntelliJ IDEA itself reports a warning: "Type parameter 'V' is never used". Moreover, Java generics are not reified, so there is no reliable way to access the type parameter at runtime (and I don't see the point of doing that anyway...).
> While the Javadoc tries to clarify the purpose of a StrLookup, the unused type parameter is still confusing, and the client code has to un-necessarily specify type parameters. For example, I have to write:
> StrLookup<?> lookup = StrLookup.noneLookup();
> StrLookup<String> lookup2 = StrLookup.systemPropertiesLookup();
> StrLookup<Integer> lookup3 = StrLookup.mapLookup(integerMap);
> instead of
> StrLookup lookup = StrLookup.noneLookup();
> StrLookup lookup2 = StrLookup.systemPropertiesLookup();
> StrLookup lookup3 = StrLookup.mapLookup(integerMap);
> My best guess is that this type parameter was added when commons-lang was generified, because StringLookup.mapLookup() takes a generified Map. Doing this is not really needed, though: we could remove the <V> type parameter everywhere, and replace the StrLookup.mapLookup()'s Map<String, V> with a Map<String, ?> (which is the same as Map<String, ? extends Object>, but shorter).
> I guess it's too late to change this now, due to backward compatibility... But I thought I'd comment just in case it's still possible.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)