You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by Greg Ederer <gr...@kleegrundig.com> on 2002/04/12 14:25:04 UTC
turbine-2.2-b2 and org.apache.turbine deps
Hi,
The org.apache.turbine.util.parser.BaseValueParser in jakarta-turbine-2
imports org.apache.turbine.om.NumberKey rather than
org.apache.torque.om.NumberKey. Ought this (and others similar) be changed?
If so, I would be happy to fix this, as well as all the stuff that this will
break, and contrib the diffs.
If not, am I doing something wrong here?
Thanks!
Greg
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: turbine-2.2-b2 and org.apache.turbine deps
Posted by Kurt Schrader <ks...@engin.umich.edu>.
Of course we'd like your diffs. :)
-Kurt
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Greg Ederer wrote:
> Many thanks to both you and John McNally. Would the project like my diffs
> when I'm done?
>
> Greg
>
> On Friday 12 April 2002 11:36 pm, Kurt Schrader wrote:
> > I ran into some problems with this as well when I transitioned my app. I
> > think that most places that this is used can be fixed by just casting the
> > variable for now. I either did that or got the number out of the object
> > and created a new version of the Torque NumberKey object from that, I
> > can't remember which. Doing that for now ought to at least let you roll
> > with your demo. I also agree that this should be changed, but the old
> > methods need to deprecated and new methods that return
> > o.a.torque.om.NumberKey need to added.
> >
> > -Kurt
> >
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, John McNally wrote:
> > > I would suggest switching them to the torque version. But jason or
> > > martin should probably speak up here.
> > >
> > > john mcnally
> > >
> > > Greg Ederer wrote:
> > > > I don't mean to be a nuissance, but we are really, really motivated to
> > > > work on this because it's holding up a demo. We already have a lot of
> > > > stuff working with decoupled Torque and Velocity.
> > > >
> > > > We just need to know whether this is the right direction (changing the
> > > > org.apache.turbine.* classes to the corresponding decoupled classes).
> > > > We want to make sure that we are in alignment with the Turbine
> > > > development plan before we proceed.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Greg
> > > >
> > > > On Friday 12 April 2002 05:25 am, Greg Ederer wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > The org.apache.turbine.util.parser.BaseValueParser in
> > > > > jakarta-turbine-2 imports org.apache.turbine.om.NumberKey rather than
> > > > > org.apache.torque.om.NumberKey. Ought this (and others similar) be
> > > > > changed? If so, I would be happy to fix this, as well as all the
> > > > > stuff that this will break, and contrib the diffs.
> > > > >
> > > > > If not, am I doing something wrong here?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Greg
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org> For additional
> > > > commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org> For additional
> > > commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: turbine-2.2-b2 and org.apache.turbine deps
Posted by Greg Ederer <gr...@kleegrundig.com>.
Many thanks to both you and John McNally. Would the project like my diffs
when I'm done?
Greg
On Friday 12 April 2002 11:36 pm, Kurt Schrader wrote:
> I ran into some problems with this as well when I transitioned my app. I
> think that most places that this is used can be fixed by just casting the
> variable for now. I either did that or got the number out of the object
> and created a new version of the Torque NumberKey object from that, I
> can't remember which. Doing that for now ought to at least let you roll
> with your demo. I also agree that this should be changed, but the old
> methods need to deprecated and new methods that return
> o.a.torque.om.NumberKey need to added.
>
> -Kurt
>
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, John McNally wrote:
> > I would suggest switching them to the torque version. But jason or
> > martin should probably speak up here.
> >
> > john mcnally
> >
> > Greg Ederer wrote:
> > > I don't mean to be a nuissance, but we are really, really motivated to
> > > work on this because it's holding up a demo. We already have a lot of
> > > stuff working with decoupled Torque and Velocity.
> > >
> > > We just need to know whether this is the right direction (changing the
> > > org.apache.turbine.* classes to the corresponding decoupled classes).
> > > We want to make sure that we are in alignment with the Turbine
> > > development plan before we proceed.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Greg
> > >
> > > On Friday 12 April 2002 05:25 am, Greg Ederer wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The org.apache.turbine.util.parser.BaseValueParser in
> > > > jakarta-turbine-2 imports org.apache.turbine.om.NumberKey rather than
> > > > org.apache.torque.om.NumberKey. Ought this (and others similar) be
> > > > changed? If so, I would be happy to fix this, as well as all the
> > > > stuff that this will break, and contrib the diffs.
> > > >
> > > > If not, am I doing something wrong here?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Greg
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org> For additional
> > > commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org> For additional
> > commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: turbine-2.2-b2 and org.apache.turbine deps
Posted by Kurt Schrader <ks...@engin.umich.edu>.
I ran into some problems with this as well when I transitioned my app. I
think that most places that this is used can be fixed by just casting the
variable for now. I either did that or got the number out of the object
and created a new version of the Torque NumberKey object from that, I
can't remember which. Doing that for now ought to at least let you roll
with your demo. I also agree that this should be changed, but the old
methods need to deprecated and new methods that return
o.a.torque.om.NumberKey need to added.
-Kurt
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, John McNally wrote:
> I would suggest switching them to the torque version. But jason or
> martin should probably speak up here.
>
> john mcnally
>
> Greg Ederer wrote:
> >
> > I don't mean to be a nuissance, but we are really, really motivated to work on
> > this because it's holding up a demo. We already have a lot of stuff working
> > with decoupled Torque and Velocity.
> >
> > We just need to know whether this is the right direction (changing the
> > org.apache.turbine.* classes to the corresponding decoupled classes). We
> > want to make sure that we are in alignment with the Turbine development plan
> > before we proceed.
> >
> > Does anyone know?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > On Friday 12 April 2002 05:25 am, Greg Ederer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The org.apache.turbine.util.parser.BaseValueParser in jakarta-turbine-2
> > > imports org.apache.turbine.om.NumberKey rather than
> > > org.apache.torque.om.NumberKey. Ought this (and others similar) be
> > > changed? If so, I would be happy to fix this, as well as all the stuff that
> > > this will break, and contrib the diffs.
> > >
> > > If not, am I doing something wrong here?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Greg
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: turbine-2.2-b2 and org.apache.turbine deps
Posted by John McNally <jm...@collab.net>.
I would suggest switching them to the torque version. But jason or
martin should probably speak up here.
john mcnally
Greg Ederer wrote:
>
> I don't mean to be a nuissance, but we are really, really motivated to work on
> this because it's holding up a demo. We already have a lot of stuff working
> with decoupled Torque and Velocity.
>
> We just need to know whether this is the right direction (changing the
> org.apache.turbine.* classes to the corresponding decoupled classes). We
> want to make sure that we are in alignment with the Turbine development plan
> before we proceed.
>
> Does anyone know?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
> On Friday 12 April 2002 05:25 am, Greg Ederer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The org.apache.turbine.util.parser.BaseValueParser in jakarta-turbine-2
> > imports org.apache.turbine.om.NumberKey rather than
> > org.apache.torque.om.NumberKey. Ought this (and others similar) be
> > changed? If so, I would be happy to fix this, as well as all the stuff that
> > this will break, and contrib the diffs.
> >
> > If not, am I doing something wrong here?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Greg
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: turbine-2.2-b2 and org.apache.turbine deps
Posted by Greg Ederer <gr...@kleegrundig.com>.
I don't mean to be a nuissance, but we are really, really motivated to work on
this because it's holding up a demo. We already have a lot of stuff working
with decoupled Torque and Velocity.
We just need to know whether this is the right direction (changing the
org.apache.turbine.* classes to the corresponding decoupled classes). We
want to make sure that we are in alignment with the Turbine development plan
before we proceed.
Does anyone know?
Thanks!
Greg
On Friday 12 April 2002 05:25 am, Greg Ederer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The org.apache.turbine.util.parser.BaseValueParser in jakarta-turbine-2
> imports org.apache.turbine.om.NumberKey rather than
> org.apache.torque.om.NumberKey. Ought this (and others similar) be
> changed? If so, I would be happy to fix this, as well as all the stuff that
> this will break, and contrib the diffs.
>
> If not, am I doing something wrong here?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>