You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by "Amend, Christian" <ch...@sap.com> on 2014/01/31 15:18:05 UTC

[VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Dear all,

This is a call for a vote on Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating. This is our 3rd try
of our 2nd release. We have resolved all issues which were discussed since our
1st release candidate.

Apache Olingo is a library implementing OData V2 protocol specification.

A vote was held on the Olingo developer mailing list and it passed with eight +1
votes where two +1 votes came from our mentors. The vote had zero -1 or 0 votes
(see the vote thread [1] and result thread [2]), and now requires a vote on this
list.

The vote will be open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1
IPMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Best Regards, 
Christian

[1] http://markmail.org/message/ugfeqpzjxrnedpqn
[2] http://markmail.org/message/uiklgm25o7upks3t

Resources ========

The release candidate is available here: 
http://people.apache.org/~chrisam/olingo2/1.1.0-RC03/

The release candidate has been signed through the key 475D9522 in: 
http://keyserver.kjsl.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x475D9522&op=vindex

The project KEYS file is available here: 
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/olingo/KEYS

The release candidate is based on the sources tagged with 1.1.0-RC03:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-olingo-odata2.git;a=commit;h=58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a
and is based on the following commit id:
58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net>.
Your wayward mentor agrees.

Sorry I have lacked time to review this release.

Regards,
Dave

On Feb 10, 2014, at 1:55 AM, Klevenz, Stephan wrote:

> Thanks :-)
> 
> Discussion about graduation will start soon...
> 
> Stephan
> 
> On 10.02.14 10:36, "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Also, why doesn't Olingo go for graduation? I had a little look around the
>> project and don't see anything holding it up.
>> 
>>  ...ant
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:35 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Looks ok to me
>>> 
>>>   ...ant
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Klevenz, Stephan
>>> <stephan.klevenz@sap.com
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> No progress on Olingo's release vote. Still one binding vote is
>>>> missing.
>>>> What else can we do to get it done?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Stephan
>>>> 
>>>> On 06.02.14 23:01, "Marvin Humphrey" <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Amend, Christian <
>>>> christian.amend@sap.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi IPMC members,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Olingo is waiting to get a third vote for our current release
>>>>>> candidate. We
>>>>>> would really appreciate if someone could have a look at this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is it time to enroll Olingo as in our release voting experiment?  Or
>>>> if
>>>>> anyone
>>>>> is opposed, how about some votes?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marvin Humphrey
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by "Klevenz, Stephan" <st...@sap.com>.
Thanks :-)

Discussion about graduation will start soon...

Stephan

On 10.02.14 10:36, "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Also, why doesn't Olingo go for graduation? I had a little look around the
>project and don't see anything holding it up.
>
>   ...ant
>
>
>On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:35 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Looks ok to me
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Klevenz, Stephan
>><stephan.klevenz@sap.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> No progress on Olingo's release vote. Still one binding vote is
>>>missing.
>>> What else can we do to get it done?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>> On 06.02.14 23:01, "Marvin Humphrey" <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Amend, Christian <
>>> christian.amend@sap.com>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >> Hi IPMC members,
>>> >>
>>> >> Olingo is waiting to get a third vote for our current release
>>> >>candidate. We
>>> >> would really appreciate if someone could have a look at this.
>>> >
>>> >Is it time to enroll Olingo as in our release voting experiment?  Or
>>>if
>>> >anyone
>>> >is opposed, how about some votes?
>>> >
>>> >Marvin Humphrey
>>> >
>>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Also, why doesn't Olingo go for graduation? I had a little look around the
project and don't see anything holding it up.

   ...ant


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:35 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Looks ok to me
>
>    ...ant
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Klevenz, Stephan <stephan.klevenz@sap.com
> > wrote:
>
>> No progress on Olingo's release vote. Still one binding vote is missing.
>> What else can we do to get it done?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stephan
>>
>> On 06.02.14 23:01, "Marvin Humphrey" <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Amend, Christian <
>> christian.amend@sap.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >> Hi IPMC members,
>> >>
>> >> Olingo is waiting to get a third vote for our current release
>> >>candidate. We
>> >> would really appreciate if someone could have a look at this.
>> >
>> >Is it time to enroll Olingo as in our release voting experiment?  Or if
>> >anyone
>> >is opposed, how about some votes?
>> >
>> >Marvin Humphrey
>> >
>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
+1

Looks ok to me

   ...ant


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Klevenz, Stephan
<st...@sap.com>wrote:

> No progress on Olingo's release vote. Still one binding vote is missing.
> What else can we do to get it done?
>
> Regards,
> Stephan
>
> On 06.02.14 23:01, "Marvin Humphrey" <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Amend, Christian <christian.amend@sap.com
> >
> >wrote:
> >> Hi IPMC members,
> >>
> >> Olingo is waiting to get a third vote for our current release
> >>candidate. We
> >> would really appreciate if someone could have a look at this.
> >
> >Is it time to enroll Olingo as in our release voting experiment?  Or if
> >anyone
> >is opposed, how about some votes?
> >
> >Marvin Humphrey
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by "Klevenz, Stephan" <st...@sap.com>.
No progress on Olingo's release vote. Still one binding vote is missing.
What else can we do to get it done?

Regards,
Stephan

On 06.02.14 23:01, "Marvin Humphrey" <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:

>On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Amend, Christian <ch...@sap.com>
>wrote:
>> Hi IPMC members,
>>
>> Olingo is waiting to get a third vote for our current release
>>candidate. We
>> would really appreciate if someone could have a look at this.
>
>Is it time to enroll Olingo as in our release voting experiment?  Or if
>anyone
>is opposed, how about some votes?
>
>Marvin Humphrey
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Amend, Christian <ch...@sap.com>
wrote:
> Hi IPMC members,
>
> Olingo is waiting to get a third vote for our current release candidate. We
> would really appreciate if someone could have a look at this.

Is it time to enroll Olingo as in our release voting experiment?  Or if anyone
is opposed, how about some votes?

Marvin Humphrey

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by "Amend, Christian" <ch...@sap.com>.
Hi IPMC members,

Olingo is waiting to get a third vote for our current release candidate. We would really appreciate if someone could have a look at this.

Thanks & Best Regards,
Christian 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Brondsema [mailto:dave@brondsema.net] 
Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 23:06
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

On 2/4/14 6:39 AM, Amend, Christian wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> thanks for your feedback :)
> 
> The parent zip file is a pure source distribution. The README contains this paragraph because we have these dependencies when building or deploying our project but they are not included in the zip file and thus are not mentioned in the LICENSE file.
> If you have a look at our dist-* (e.g. dist-ref) packages they contain the necessary licenses in the LICENSE file for the binary sources they include.

I see.  Your dist-* zip files look from what I can tell.  However, I would like
it if another IPMC member could take a look and give you the 3rd +1, since I do
not have a lot of experience assessing licensing for binary jar releases.

> 
> The sha files were built with sha512 and I think we will change the naming there for the next release to make this more clear.
> 
> The way I understood the paragraph in [1] is that if you make changes to the mandatory text it has to be approved by the Incubator PMC. Since we did not change this and only added our website at the end I hope this is within the acceptable range. Nevertheless if this is no show stopper I will address this on our mailing list after the release.

Right, it probably is just fine how you have it, so not a show stopper.  Just a
little bit more proper for a future release.

> 
> Thanks & Best Regards,
> Christian
> 
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Brondsema [mailto:dave@brondsema.net] 
> Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 06:52
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)
> 
> Hello Christian, and Olingo team.
> 
> So far I have only looked at
> olingo-odata2-parent-incubating-1.1.0-RC03-source-release.zip since it seemed
> like the main source file.  I also haven't tried to build it, since it's been a
> long time since I've done any Java :)
> 
> The last section in the README file states there are dual licenses, weak
> copyleft dependencies, etc, and refers to the LICENSE file for details.  The
> LICENSE file only has the AL2 in it.  Are there additional licenses used in
> Olingo?  If so, they should be properly referenced in the LICENSE file.  If not,
> the README shouldn't state such things.  I wouldn't put any licensing info in
> the README either way, the LICENSE file should cover that in a single document.
> 
> The DISCLAIMER file has extra content (after the 3rd paragraph) that is not
> needed.  It doesn't seem harmful to me, but
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers is pretty clear
> about using exact text without changes.  I also agree with Francesco on your dev
> list about removing blank lines from NOTICE.
> 
> What format are the .sha files?  I tried all the sha*sum commands on my system
> and none produced anything even similar.  I suggest naming them *.sha1 or
> *.sha512 for example.
> 
> -Dave
> 
> 
> On 1/31/14 9:18 AM, Amend, Christian wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> This is a call for a vote on Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating. This is our 3rd try
>> of our 2nd release. We have resolved all issues which were discussed since our
>> 1st release candidate.
>>
>> Apache Olingo is a library implementing OData V2 protocol specification.
>>
>> A vote was held on the Olingo developer mailing list and it passed with eight +1
>> votes where two +1 votes came from our mentors. The vote had zero -1 or 0 votes
>> (see the vote thread [1] and result thread [2]), and now requires a vote on this
>> list.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1
>> IPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Best Regards, 
>> Christian
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ugfeqpzjxrnedpqn
>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/uiklgm25o7upks3t
>>
>> Resources ========
>>
>> The release candidate is available here: 
>> http://people.apache.org/~chrisam/olingo2/1.1.0-RC03/
>>
>> The release candidate has been signed through the key 475D9522 in: 
>> http://keyserver.kjsl.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x475D9522&op=vindex
>>
>> The project KEYS file is available here: 
>> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/olingo/KEYS
>>
>> The release candidate is based on the sources tagged with 1.1.0-RC03:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-olingo-odata2.git;a=commit;h=58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a
>> and is based on the following commit id:
>> 58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
              <><

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>.
On 2/4/14 6:39 AM, Amend, Christian wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> thanks for your feedback :)
> 
> The parent zip file is a pure source distribution. The README contains this paragraph because we have these dependencies when building or deploying our project but they are not included in the zip file and thus are not mentioned in the LICENSE file.
> If you have a look at our dist-* (e.g. dist-ref) packages they contain the necessary licenses in the LICENSE file for the binary sources they include.

I see.  Your dist-* zip files look from what I can tell.  However, I would like
it if another IPMC member could take a look and give you the 3rd +1, since I do
not have a lot of experience assessing licensing for binary jar releases.

> 
> The sha files were built with sha512 and I think we will change the naming there for the next release to make this more clear.
> 
> The way I understood the paragraph in [1] is that if you make changes to the mandatory text it has to be approved by the Incubator PMC. Since we did not change this and only added our website at the end I hope this is within the acceptable range. Nevertheless if this is no show stopper I will address this on our mailing list after the release.

Right, it probably is just fine how you have it, so not a show stopper.  Just a
little bit more proper for a future release.

> 
> Thanks & Best Regards,
> Christian
> 
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Brondsema [mailto:dave@brondsema.net] 
> Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 06:52
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)
> 
> Hello Christian, and Olingo team.
> 
> So far I have only looked at
> olingo-odata2-parent-incubating-1.1.0-RC03-source-release.zip since it seemed
> like the main source file.  I also haven't tried to build it, since it's been a
> long time since I've done any Java :)
> 
> The last section in the README file states there are dual licenses, weak
> copyleft dependencies, etc, and refers to the LICENSE file for details.  The
> LICENSE file only has the AL2 in it.  Are there additional licenses used in
> Olingo?  If so, they should be properly referenced in the LICENSE file.  If not,
> the README shouldn't state such things.  I wouldn't put any licensing info in
> the README either way, the LICENSE file should cover that in a single document.
> 
> The DISCLAIMER file has extra content (after the 3rd paragraph) that is not
> needed.  It doesn't seem harmful to me, but
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers is pretty clear
> about using exact text without changes.  I also agree with Francesco on your dev
> list about removing blank lines from NOTICE.
> 
> What format are the .sha files?  I tried all the sha*sum commands on my system
> and none produced anything even similar.  I suggest naming them *.sha1 or
> *.sha512 for example.
> 
> -Dave
> 
> 
> On 1/31/14 9:18 AM, Amend, Christian wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> This is a call for a vote on Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating. This is our 3rd try
>> of our 2nd release. We have resolved all issues which were discussed since our
>> 1st release candidate.
>>
>> Apache Olingo is a library implementing OData V2 protocol specification.
>>
>> A vote was held on the Olingo developer mailing list and it passed with eight +1
>> votes where two +1 votes came from our mentors. The vote had zero -1 or 0 votes
>> (see the vote thread [1] and result thread [2]), and now requires a vote on this
>> list.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1
>> IPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Best Regards, 
>> Christian
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ugfeqpzjxrnedpqn
>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/uiklgm25o7upks3t
>>
>> Resources ========
>>
>> The release candidate is available here: 
>> http://people.apache.org/~chrisam/olingo2/1.1.0-RC03/
>>
>> The release candidate has been signed through the key 475D9522 in: 
>> http://keyserver.kjsl.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x475D9522&op=vindex
>>
>> The project KEYS file is available here: 
>> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/olingo/KEYS
>>
>> The release candidate is based on the sources tagged with 1.1.0-RC03:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-olingo-odata2.git;a=commit;h=58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a
>> and is based on the following commit id:
>> 58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
              <><

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by "Amend, Christian" <ch...@sap.com>.
Hi Dave,

thanks for your feedback :)

The parent zip file is a pure source distribution. The README contains this paragraph because we have these dependencies when building or deploying our project but they are not included in the zip file and thus are not mentioned in the LICENSE file.
If you have a look at our dist-* (e.g. dist-ref) packages they contain the necessary licenses in the LICENSE file for the binary sources they include.

The sha files were built with sha512 and I think we will change the naming there for the next release to make this more clear.

The way I understood the paragraph in [1] is that if you make changes to the mandatory text it has to be approved by the Incubator PMC. Since we did not change this and only added our website at the end I hope this is within the acceptable range. Nevertheless if this is no show stopper I will address this on our mailing list after the release.

Thanks & Best Regards,
Christian

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Brondsema [mailto:dave@brondsema.net] 
Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 06:52
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Hello Christian, and Olingo team.

So far I have only looked at
olingo-odata2-parent-incubating-1.1.0-RC03-source-release.zip since it seemed
like the main source file.  I also haven't tried to build it, since it's been a
long time since I've done any Java :)

The last section in the README file states there are dual licenses, weak
copyleft dependencies, etc, and refers to the LICENSE file for details.  The
LICENSE file only has the AL2 in it.  Are there additional licenses used in
Olingo?  If so, they should be properly referenced in the LICENSE file.  If not,
the README shouldn't state such things.  I wouldn't put any licensing info in
the README either way, the LICENSE file should cover that in a single document.

The DISCLAIMER file has extra content (after the 3rd paragraph) that is not
needed.  It doesn't seem harmful to me, but
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers is pretty clear
about using exact text without changes.  I also agree with Francesco on your dev
list about removing blank lines from NOTICE.

What format are the .sha files?  I tried all the sha*sum commands on my system
and none produced anything even similar.  I suggest naming them *.sha1 or
*.sha512 for example.

-Dave


On 1/31/14 9:18 AM, Amend, Christian wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating. This is our 3rd try
> of our 2nd release. We have resolved all issues which were discussed since our
> 1st release candidate.
> 
> Apache Olingo is a library implementing OData V2 protocol specification.
> 
> A vote was held on the Olingo developer mailing list and it passed with eight +1
> votes where two +1 votes came from our mentors. The vote had zero -1 or 0 votes
> (see the vote thread [1] and result thread [2]), and now requires a vote on this
> list.
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1
> IPMC votes are cast.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> Best Regards, 
> Christian
> 
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ugfeqpzjxrnedpqn
> [2] http://markmail.org/message/uiklgm25o7upks3t
> 
> Resources ========
> 
> The release candidate is available here: 
> http://people.apache.org/~chrisam/olingo2/1.1.0-RC03/
> 
> The release candidate has been signed through the key 475D9522 in: 
> http://keyserver.kjsl.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x475D9522&op=vindex
> 
> The project KEYS file is available here: 
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/olingo/KEYS
> 
> The release candidate is based on the sources tagged with 1.1.0-RC03:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-olingo-odata2.git;a=commit;h=58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a
> and is based on the following commit id:
> 58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 



-- 
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
              <><

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating (RC03)

Posted by Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>.
Hello Christian, and Olingo team.

So far I have only looked at
olingo-odata2-parent-incubating-1.1.0-RC03-source-release.zip since it seemed
like the main source file.  I also haven't tried to build it, since it's been a
long time since I've done any Java :)

The last section in the README file states there are dual licenses, weak
copyleft dependencies, etc, and refers to the LICENSE file for details.  The
LICENSE file only has the AL2 in it.  Are there additional licenses used in
Olingo?  If so, they should be properly referenced in the LICENSE file.  If not,
the README shouldn't state such things.  I wouldn't put any licensing info in
the README either way, the LICENSE file should cover that in a single document.

The DISCLAIMER file has extra content (after the 3rd paragraph) that is not
needed.  It doesn't seem harmful to me, but
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers is pretty clear
about using exact text without changes.  I also agree with Francesco on your dev
list about removing blank lines from NOTICE.

What format are the .sha files?  I tried all the sha*sum commands on my system
and none produced anything even similar.  I suggest naming them *.sha1 or
*.sha512 for example.

-Dave


On 1/31/14 9:18 AM, Amend, Christian wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating. This is our 3rd try
> of our 2nd release. We have resolved all issues which were discussed since our
> 1st release candidate.
> 
> Apache Olingo is a library implementing OData V2 protocol specification.
> 
> A vote was held on the Olingo developer mailing list and it passed with eight +1
> votes where two +1 votes came from our mentors. The vote had zero -1 or 0 votes
> (see the vote thread [1] and result thread [2]), and now requires a vote on this
> list.
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1
> IPMC votes are cast.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Olingo 1.1.0 incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> Best Regards, 
> Christian
> 
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ugfeqpzjxrnedpqn
> [2] http://markmail.org/message/uiklgm25o7upks3t
> 
> Resources ========
> 
> The release candidate is available here: 
> http://people.apache.org/~chrisam/olingo2/1.1.0-RC03/
> 
> The release candidate has been signed through the key 475D9522 in: 
> http://keyserver.kjsl.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x475D9522&op=vindex
> 
> The project KEYS file is available here: 
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/olingo/KEYS
> 
> The release candidate is based on the sources tagged with 1.1.0-RC03:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-olingo-odata2.git;a=commit;h=58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a
> and is based on the following commit id:
> 58849673f6eeb1817d7c952ef11667989b8a994a
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 



-- 
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
              <><

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org