You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/09/02 08:41:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (CAMEL-5884) camel-cxf - Allow to define which operationNames a given consumer services
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-5884.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Abandoned
> camel-cxf - Allow to define which operationNames a given consumer services
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-5884
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5884
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: camel-cxf
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Willem Jiang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> Currently when using a cxf consumer in a route, then all the operations is serviced by this route.
> This may confuse some people. As well some may want one route per operation.
> We should look into how we can support this.
> Today people would need to use the recipient list and direct endpoints to suport this. But many people dont know about this. See this example: http://camel.apache.org/cxf-tomcat-example.html
> I guess this is not so easy, as you would then have mutliple routes with the same CXF "webservice". But we would like to have this level of indirection.
> And then I guess if a operation name is not bound to any route, then a soap fault should be thrown. Or we should allow to let Camel fail on startup saying that operation XXX is not bound to any consumer/route. Or something like that. Or allow people to turn this on|off.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)