[jira] [Comment Edited] (QPID-7068) Drive AbstractConfiguredObject#validationChange from reflection rather than attribute metadata

["Alex Rudyy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15150412#comment-15150412 ] 

Alex Rudyy edited comment on QPID-7068 at 2/17/16 12:14 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

The fix was back-ported into 6.0.x branch and committed under revision [https://svn.apache.org/r1730717]


was (Author: alex.rufous):
The fix was back-ported into 6.0.x branch and committed under revision [https://svn.apache.org/r1730697]

> Drive AbstractConfiguredObject#validationChange from reflection rather than attribute metadata
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-7068
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7068
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java Broker
>            Reporter: Keith Wall
>             Fix For: qpid-java-6.0.1, qpid-java-6.1
>
>
> A defect came to light where a {{org.apache.qpid.server.model.AbstractConfiguredObject#validateChange}} failed internally with an UnsupportedMethodException from AbstractConfiguredObject.java:2902.
> The particular problem was caused by the overriding of {{ACO#getName}} in an implementation's interface.  This was hiding the  attribute's annotation and prevented AttributeGettingHandler from locating the validation proxy method.
> This highlighted the need to change AttributeGettingHandler to drive the validation using reflected metadata, rather the the attribute metadata.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org