You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Objelean Alex <al...@gmail.com> on 2009/05/20 14:39:03 UTC

WICKET-2244 status

I've noticed that the following Jira issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2244 isn't assigned to
anybody. I know that you all are quite busy, and don't want to bother
wicket developers, but... it would be nice if the fix would be
included in 1.4-rc5. It is a 10 minutes job, and still it is quite
important.  Thank you!

Alex Objelean

Re: WICKET-2244 status

Posted by Alex Objelean <al...@yahoo.com>.
In my situation, I would implement the MinimumValidator anonymously and just
override the resourceKey method. I don't think it is a good idea to have
duplicated resource keys, even I would... it wouldn't solve the problem with
legacy resource keys (when they should remain unchanged).

Alex.


Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
> 
> Wouldn't it be simpler to duplicate your strings in the resource files
> rather than having to create a subclass for each place in code and go
> replace every occurence of MinimumValidator with MyMinimumValidator?
> It seems that the first way is much less likely to create a bug.
> 
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Alex Objelean <al...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I need to support some legacy resource keys... also, for some situations
>> I
>> need to reuse the same message for different type of errors (for instance
>> year.Required == date.MinimumValidator)
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>>>
>>> What is re usecase?
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 20, 2009, Objelean Alex <al...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I've noticed that the following Jira issue:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2244 isn't assigned to
>>>> anybody. I know that you all are quite busy, and don't want to bother
>>>> wicket developers, but... it would be nice if the fix would be
>>>> included in 1.4-rc5. It is a 10 minutes job, and still it is quite
>>>> important.  Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> Alex Objelean
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/WICKET-2244-status-tp23634634p23639337.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WICKET-2244-status-tp23634634p23639602.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: WICKET-2244 status

Posted by Jeremy Thomerson <je...@wickettraining.com>.
Wouldn't it be simpler to duplicate your strings in the resource files
rather than having to create a subclass for each place in code and go
replace every occurence of MinimumValidator with MyMinimumValidator?
It seems that the first way is much less likely to create a bug.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com




On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Alex Objelean <al...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I need to support some legacy resource keys... also, for some situations I
> need to reuse the same message for different type of errors (for instance
> year.Required == date.MinimumValidator)
>
> Thank you!
> Alex
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>>
>> What is re usecase?
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 20, 2009, Objelean Alex <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've noticed that the following Jira issue:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2244 isn't assigned to
>>> anybody. I know that you all are quite busy, and don't want to bother
>>> wicket developers, but... it would be nice if the fix would be
>>> included in 1.4-rc5. It is a 10 minutes job, and still it is quite
>>> important.  Thank you!
>>>
>>> Alex Objelean
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WICKET-2244-status-tp23634634p23639337.html
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Re: WICKET-2244 status

Posted by Alex Objelean <al...@yahoo.com>.
I need to support some legacy resource keys... also, for some situations I
need to reuse the same message for different type of errors (for instance
year.Required == date.MinimumValidator)

Thank you!
Alex


igor.vaynberg wrote:
> 
> What is re usecase?
> 
> -igor
> 
> On Wednesday, May 20, 2009, Objelean Alex <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've noticed that the following Jira issue:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2244 isn't assigned to
>> anybody. I know that you all are quite busy, and don't want to bother
>> wicket developers, but... it would be nice if the fix would be
>> included in 1.4-rc5. It is a 10 minutes job, and still it is quite
>> important.  Thank you!
>>
>> Alex Objelean
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WICKET-2244-status-tp23634634p23639337.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: WICKET-2244 status

Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
What is re usecase?

-igor

On Wednesday, May 20, 2009, Objelean Alex <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've noticed that the following Jira issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2244 isn't assigned to
> anybody. I know that you all are quite busy, and don't want to bother
> wicket developers, but... it would be nice if the fix would be
> included in 1.4-rc5. It is a 10 minutes job, and still it is quite
> important.  Thank you!
>
> Alex Objelean
>